首页> 外文期刊>Human Rights Law Review >The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: An Ex Ante Assessment of itsn Effectiveness in Light of the Drafting Process
【24h】

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: An Ex Ante Assessment of itsn Effectiveness in Light of the Drafting Process

机译:经济,社会,文化权利国际公约任择议定书:根据起草过程对其效力进行事前评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article it is submitted that the text of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as finally adopted on 10 December 2008, is to be seen as the outcome of a drafting process that was dominated by ideological prejudices rather than concerns with potential effectiveness. It goes without saying that political and ideological considerations always play a large part in negotiations of human rights instruments. However, the key question is whether this bargaining process has resulted in a potentially effective mechanism for addressing economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights violations, which takes into account the specificity of ESC rights, or rather an instrument which reflects the longstanding ideological prejudices against and scepticism towards ESC rights. Potential effectiveness is believed to have been jeopardised by weak wording, as a weak procedure is unlikely to be able to satisfactorily respond to violations of rights. At times an absolutist search for consensus seems to have been the driving force behind weakening the text.
机译:在本条中,提交人认为,《经济,社会,文化权利国际盟约任择议定书》的案文最终于2008年12月10日获得通过,被视为以意识形态偏见为主导的起草过程的结果。而不是担心潜在的效果。毋庸置疑,政治和意识形态因素在人权文书的谈判中始终起着重要作用。但是,关键问题是,这种讨价还价过程是否产生了一种潜在的有效机制来解决经济,社会和文化(ESC)权利受到侵犯,并考虑了ESC权利的特殊性,还是反映了长期存在的意识形态偏见的工具对ESC权利的反对和怀疑。人们认为,措词不力可能会损害潜在的效力,因为程序不力不能令人满意地应对侵犯人权的行为。有时,专制主义者寻求共识似乎是削弱文本的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号