首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Psychology of Education >Analysis of the relation between academic procrastination, academic rational/irrational beliefs, time preferences to study for exams, and academic achievement: a structural model
【24h】

Analysis of the relation between academic procrastination, academic rational/irrational beliefs, time preferences to study for exams, and academic achievement: a structural model

机译:学术拖延,学术理性/非理性信念,考试学习时间偏好和学业成绩之间的关系分析:结构模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between academic rational/irrational beliefs, academic procrastination, and time preferences to study for exams and academic achievement by using the structural equation model. The sample consisted of 281 undergraduate students who filled in questionnaires at the 7-week-long summer course. Students responded to questionnaires assessing their levels of (a) academic procrastination, (b) academic rational/irrational beliefs, and (c) time preferences to study for exams and demographic information sheet. In general, the results showed that rational academic beliefs have a direct impact on academic procrastination and time preferences to study for exams. Academic rational beliefs also have an impact on academic achievement indirectly by mediation of academic procrastination and time preferences to study for exams. The results also showed that academic procrastination has an impact on academic achievement both directly and by mediation of time preferences to study for exams. This study suggested that there is a relation between academic procrastination and rational academic beliefs, which should be addressed further in counseling intervention. Knowledge about the role of irrational academic beliefs and their relations with academic procrastination may assist school/ college counselors to develop interventions for students that suffer from delaying behaviors that negatively affect academic success.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过使用结构方程模型研究学术理性/非理性信念,学术拖延和时间偏好以研究考试和学术成就之间的关系。样本由281名大学生组成,他们在为期7周的夏季课程中填写了问卷。学生对问卷进行了评估,以评估他们的水平:(a)学术拖延,(b)学术理性/非理性信念以及(c)学习考试和人口统计学信息表的时间偏好。总体而言,结果表明,理性的学术信仰对学术拖延和学习考试的时间偏好有直接影响。学术理性信念还可以通过调停学术拖延和学习考试的时间偏好来间接影响学业成绩。结果还表明,学术拖延直接或通过调解学习考试的时间偏好对学习成绩产生影响。这项研究表明,学业拖延和理性学业信念之间存在联系,应在咨询干预中进一步解决。有关非理性学术信仰的作用及其与学术拖延的关系的知识可能会帮助学校/大学辅导员针对因行为延迟而对学术成就产生负面影响的学生制定干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号