首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >The activation logic in national sickness absence policies: Comparing the Netherlands, Denmark and Ireland
【24h】

The activation logic in national sickness absence policies: Comparing the Netherlands, Denmark and Ireland

机译:国家疾病缺席政策中的激活逻辑:比较荷兰,丹麦和爱尔兰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare sickness absence policies in the Netherlands, Denmark and Ireland, examining whether and how the institutional logic of activation' that is paramount in Europe is understood and given shape in each country. They differ in their support for the underlying ideas of activation', and especially vary in the design of their governance systems, as can be seen in the allocation of responsibilities, the description of return-to-work routines and the use of regulative instruments. We contribute to institutional theory by demonstrating the important but often neglected role of national governance systems in the macro-micro linkage between institutional logics and organizational and individual behaviour. Since sickness absence is a major cause of workforce inactivity, the practical relevance of this study is the comparative reflection on recent policy developments to improve sickness absence management.
机译:我们比较了荷兰,丹麦和爱尔兰的疾病缺席政策,研究了是否以及如何理解和激活了欧洲每个国家中最重要的激励机制。他们对激励的基本思想的支持不同,尤其是其治理体系的设计各不相同,这可以从职责分配,重返工作例行程序的描述以及使用法规工具中看出。我们通过证明国家治理系统在制度逻辑与组织和个人行为之间的宏观-微观联系中的重要但经常被忽略的作用,为制度理论做出了贡献。由于疾病缺席是导致劳动力缺乏活动的主要原因,因此本研究的实际意义是对最近旨在改善疾病缺席管理的政策发展的比较思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号