...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental policy and governance >What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A Comparison With the Water Framework Directive, Early Evidence from Germany and a Research Agenda
【24h】

What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A Comparison With the Water Framework Directive, Early Evidence from Germany and a Research Agenda

机译:公众参与在执行欧盟洪水指令中扮演什么角色?与水框架指令,德国的早期证据和研究议程进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We examine the roles and functions of non-state actor participation in implementing the EU Floods Directive of 2007 (FD). We draw on experiences with participation under the Water Framework Directive (WFD), because of important links between the two directives. Comparing the legal bases and the different functions for participation, we observe the paradoxical situation that while the WFD has fervently advocated public participation public interest has remained low, whereas the FD is less sanguine about participation despite citizens being potentially more affected by flood management issues - particularly given the current trend towards a 'risk management' approach under the FD. Our examination of current FD implementation in Germany reveals a considerable variety of participation approaches, as well as a general trend to 'less' rather than 'more' participation as compared with the WFD. The paper closes by discussing implications for future flood management planning and avenues for comparative research.
机译:我们研究了非国家参与者参与实施2007年欧盟洪水指令(FD)的角色和功能。由于这两个指令之间的重要联系,我们借鉴了《水框架指令》(WFD)的参与经验。比较法律参与基础和参与的不同功能,我们发现自相矛盾的情况是,尽管世界粮食日(WFD)大力倡导公众参与,但公众利益仍然很低,而世界自然基金会(FD)对参与的看法却不那么乐观,尽管公民可能受到洪水管理问题的影响更大-特别是考虑到当前在FD下采取“风险管理”方法的趋势。我们对德国当前FD实施的检查发现,参与方法多种多样,并且与WFD相比,总体趋势是“更少”而不是“更多”参与。最后,本文讨论了对未来洪水管理计划的意义以及进行比较研究的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号