...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology law quarterly >Jurisdictional Determinations and Judicial Scrutiny
【24h】

Jurisdictional Determinations and Judicial Scrutiny

机译:司法裁定和司法审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the past two decades, the Supreme Court has significantly reduced the deference given to the "Jurisdictional Determinations " made by the Army Corps of Engineers under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Previous to the Court's holding in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Court had continuously upheld the Corps' interpretation of section 404"s jurisdictional reach. From Solid Waste Agency onwards, however, the Court has continuously raised the level of scrutiny applied to the Corps' jurisdictional rules under section 404. This Note explores how the Supreme Court's scrutiny of the Corps' Jurisdictional Determinations has evolved, starting with the Court's relatively lax approach in United States, v. Riverside Bayview Homes and followed by the Court's gradual heightening of scrutiny through Solid Waste Agency, Rapanos v. United States, and Hawkes v. Army Corps of Engineers. This Note then examines how the conservative thrust of this evolution, which limits the Corps' regulatory authority, has undermined the environmental mission that Congress designed in the Clean Water Act.
机译:在过去的二十年中,最高法院大大减少了对陆军工程兵团根据《清洁水法》 404条做出的“管辖权裁决”的尊重。在法院持有北库克郡固体废物局诉美国陆军工程兵团的判决之前,法院一直维持兵团对第404条的管辖范围的解释。但是,从固体废物局开始,法院已经不断提高对第404条所适用的军团管辖权规则的审查水平。本说明探讨了最高法院对军团管辖权决定的审查是如何演变的,从法院在美国相对松懈的方法v。Riverside Bayview Homes开始然后法院通过固体废物局,拉帕诺斯诉美国和霍克斯诉陆军工程兵团逐步加强了审查。本说明随后研究了这种演变的保守主旨如何限制了兵团的监管权。破坏了国会在《清洁水法》中规定的环境使命。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecology law quarterly》 |2019年第2期|485-517|共33页
  • 作者

    Michael Riggins;

  • 作者单位

    University of California Berkeley School of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号