首页> 外文学位 >Fair use, the First Amendment, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): A case for heightened judicial scrutiny?
【24h】

Fair use, the First Amendment, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): A case for heightened judicial scrutiny?

机译:合理使用,第一修正案和数字千年版权法案(DMCA):是否需要加强司法审查?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study critically examines section 1201 of the new addition to the United States copyright law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The specific focus on is on how this section impacts customary non-infringing uses of copyrighted material allowed by previously existing law.; Of particular interest to this study is section 1201 of the DMCA, which bans the circumvention of technological measures put in place by content creators to protect their work, and also bans the trafficking in devices of circumvention. At first blush, this section of the DMCA seems like an effective measure to prevent piracy. The problem is that such bans go too far by not making adequate provisions for the continuing existence of fair use in the digital age. The goal of this study find a way of balancing all the interests involved in digital copyright regulation such that the information industry would be equipped with the tools necessary to protect the industry and the general public would still have traditional fair access and use of digital information.; Using interest group theory, this study suggests heightened judicial scrutiny of cases arising from section 1201 of the DMCA as a way of maintaining the balance of interests in copyright law. Heightened judicial scrutiny provides an impartial overview of the DMCA in non-infringing situations to benefit the public domain and still provide incentive to create to the information industry by providing adequate legal protection for digital information.
机译:这项研究严格审查了美国版权法新增加的第1201节,即数字千年版权法案(DMCA)。具体的重点是本部分如何影响先前存在的法律所允许的版权材料的习惯性非侵权使用。这项研究特别令人感兴趣的是DMCA的第1201节,该节禁止规避内容创作者为保护其作品而采取的技术措施,还禁止对规避设备的贩运。乍一看,数字千年版权法案(DMCA)的这一部分似乎是防止盗版的有效措施。问题在于,这样的禁令对于没有为数字时代中的合理使用的持续存在做出充分的规定太过分了。这项研究的目的是找到一种平衡数字版权法规所涉及的所有利益的方法,以使信息产业能够配备保护该产业所必需的工具,而普通公众仍然可以传统地公平地使用和使用数字信息。 ;这项研究使用利益集团理论,建议对DMCA第1201条提出的案件进行司法审查,以保持版权法中利益的平衡。加强司法审查可对非侵权情况下的数字千年版权法案(DMCA)进行公正的概述,以造福于公共领域,并通过为数字信息提供适当的法律保护,仍然为创建信息产业提供动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号