...
首页> 外文期刊>Biology of sport / >Comparison of effects of training order of explosive strength and plyometrics training on different physical abilities in adolescent handball players
【24h】

Comparison of effects of training order of explosive strength and plyometrics training on different physical abilities in adolescent handball players

机译:爆炸力量和普莱叶绿素训练训练训练对青少年手球运动员不同身体能力的影响比较

获取原文
           

摘要

While both plyometric and traditional resistance training methods are beneficial to athletic performance in a wide range of sports, their efficacy regarding training order has yet to be determined in a periodized training programme. Therefore, this study compared the effects of a 12-week training period where explosive strength training (six weeks) preceded plyometric training (six weeks), or vice versa. Forty-two competitive male (n = 12) and female (n = 30) adolescent handball players (age 14.9 ± 0.5 years, body mass 64.1 ± 9.1 kg, height 1.71 ± 0.09 m) conducted explosive strength training for six weeks followed by six weeks of plyometric training or vice versa. Variables included a 30 m sprint, a change of direction test, countermovement jump (CMJ) with and without arm swing, load-velocity back squat assessment, overhead throwing velocity with and without preliminary steps, and the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1). Both groups experienced similar improvements in the CMJ, change of direction and load-velocity squat assessments from pre- to posttest (p ≤ 0.013, η sup2/sup = 0.194–0.378). Conversely, no improvements were observed in the Yo-Yo IR1, 30 m sprint or throwing velocity tests, regardless of group (p ≥ 0.081). No main effect of training order was observed for any of the tests employed (p ≥ 0.31). Training order does not appear to play a noticeable role in the physical development of young handball players. Therefore, practitioners could focus on implementing variations in exercise and loading to benefit athlete adherence and correspond to present needs.
机译:虽然玻璃纤维和传统的抗性训练方法都有利于各种运动中的运动性能,但它们对培训令的效力尚未在统治培训计划中确定。因此,本研究比较了12周培训期的效果,其中爆炸性强度训练(六周)之前是梭氏训练(六周),反之亦然。四十二竞争男性(n = 12)和女性(n = 30)青少年手球运动员(年龄14.9±0.5岁,体重64.1±9.1公斤,高度1.71±0.09米)进行了爆炸性的力量训练六周,然后六周进行六周几周的锭般的训练,反之亦然。变量包括30米冲刺,方向测试的变化,对策跳转(CMJ),带有臂摆动,负载速度反向蹲下评估,带有初步步骤的开销速度速度,以及YO-YO间歇性恢复测试等级1 (yo-yo ir1)。两组在PRE-to PROSTEST(P≤0.013,η 2 = 0.194-0.378)中经历了类似的改进,方向和载荷 - 速度下蹲评估的改变和载荷 - 速度蹲伏评估。相反,无论组(P≥0.081),在yo-yo yo yo yo yo yo yo yo yo yo-yo-yo yo y1,30 m sprint或投掷速度测试中没有观察到改进(p≥0.081)。没有针对所用的任何测试观察培训订单的主要效果(P≥0.31)。培训订单似乎在年轻手球运动员的体力发展中发挥着明显的作用。因此,从业者可以专注于在运动和装载方面实施变化,以使运动员遵守,并对应于现在的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号