首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Visual search in large letter arrays containing words: are words implicitly processed during letter search?
【24h】

Visual search in large letter arrays containing words: are words implicitly processed during letter search?

机译:在包含单词的大型字母数组中进行可视搜索:单词搜索期间是否隐式处理了单词?

获取原文
           

摘要

The word superiority effect (Cattell, 1886) is discussed in psychology for more than a century. However, a question remains whether automatic word processing is possible without its spatial segregation. Our previous studies of letter search in large letter arrays containing words without spatial segregation revealed no difference in performance and eye movements when observers searched for letters always embedded in words, never embedded in words, or when there were no words in the array (Falikman, 2014; Falikman, Yazykov, 2015). Yet both the percentage of participants who noticed words during letter search and their subjective reports whether words made search easier or harder significantly differed for target letters within words and target letters out of words. In the current study, we used the Processes Dissociation Procedure (Jacoby, 1991) to investigate whether words are processed implicitly when observers search for letters. Two groups of participants, 40 subjects each, performed 1-minute search for 24 target letters (either Ts, always within words, or Hs, always out of words) in the same letter array of 10 pseudorandom letter strings, 60 letters each, containing 24 Russian mid-frequency nouns. After that, they filled in two identical word-stem completion forms, each containing the same 48 word beginnings (24 for words included in the array). First, the participants were instructed to use words that could appear in the search array ("inclusion test"), then a?? to avoid using such words ("exclusion test"). Comparison of conscious and unconscious processing probabilities revealed no difference between them (with the former not exceeding 0.09 and the latter not exceeding 0.11), no difference between the two conditions, and no interaction between the factors. This allows concluding that, despite of subjective reports, words embedded in random letter strings are mostly not processed either explicitly or implicitly during letter search, and that automatic unitization requires spatial segregation.
机译:优势效应一词(Cattell,1886年)在心理学中讨论了一个多世纪。然而,仍然存在一个问题,即在没有空间隔离的情况下是否可以进行自动文字处理。我们先前的研究是在大型字母数组中包含没有空间隔离的单词的字母搜索中发现,当观察者搜索始终嵌入单词中,从未嵌入单词中的字母或数组中没有单词时,性能和眼动都没有差异(Falikman, 2014; Falikman,Yazykov,2015)。然而,在单词搜索期间注意到单词的参与者的百分比以及他们的主观报告(无论单词使搜索变得容易还是困难)对于单词内的目标字母和单词外的目标字母都存在显着差异。在当前的研究中,我们使用过程解离过程(Jacoby,1991)来研究观察者搜索字母时是否隐式处理了单词。两组参与者(每人40个主题)在10个伪随机字母字符串(每个60个字母)的相同字母数组中对24个目标字母(Ts,总是在单词内,或Hs,总是在单词外)进行1分钟搜索24个俄语中频名词。之后,他们填写了两个相同的词干完成形式,每个形式包含相同的48个词首(对于数组中包含的词为24个)。首先,指示参与者使用可能出现在搜索数组中的单词(“包含测试”),然后使用?避免使用此类词语(“排除测试”)。有意识和无意识加工概率的比较表明,它们之间没有差异(前者不超过0.09,后者不超过0.11),两种情况之间没有差异,并且因素之间也没有相互作用。这可以得出结论,尽管有主观的报告,但是在字母搜索过程中,几乎不会显式或隐式地处理随机字母字符串中嵌入的单词,并且自动单元化需要空间隔离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号