...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Korean Chemical Society >Analysis of the End-of-Chapter Questions in Chemistry II according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
【24h】

Analysis of the End-of-Chapter Questions in Chemistry II according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

机译:根据修订的Bloom教育目标分类法对化学II中的章末问题进行分析

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study, we analyzed the end-of-chapter questions in 8 types of chemistry II textbooks for science teachers according to revised Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives not only to raise interests of questions in textbooks but also acquire a basic material for using questions in textbooks effectively. The results of classification following Bloom's cognitive category showed that 'Understanding(44.7%)' level was the most, then 'Application(29.9%)', Knowledge(15.6%) and 'Analysis (9.5%)' in order, which is distinct difference from the result of classification of the end-of-chapter questions in college general chemistry books which was 'Application', 'Analysis' and 'Understanding' in order. Especially, questions of 'Evaluation' level were not found at all in any textbook investigated and ??Synthesis(0.3%)' level was very few. On the other hand, the percentage of questions in 'Understanding' and 'Executing Quantitative' which required specific algorithms was 70% of total with most of the questions in 'Application' were 'Executing Quantitative'.
机译:在这项研究中,我们根据经修订的Bloom的教育目标分类法,分析了8种供科学老师使用的化学II类教科书的章尾问题,不仅提高了教科书中问题的兴趣,而且获得了在教科书中使用问题的基本材料。有效的教科书。根据布鲁姆认知类别的分类结果显示,“理解(44.7%)”水平最高,其次是“应用(29.9%)”,知识(15.6%)和“分析(9.5%)”,这是明显的与大学普通化学书中每章末尾问题的分类结果的区别是“应用”,“分析”和“理解”。尤其是,在所调查的任何教科书中都根本没有“评估”级别的问题,而“综合(0.3%)”级别则很少。另一方面,需要特定算法的“理解”和“执行定量”中的问题占总数的70%,而“应用程序”中的大多数问题都是“执行定量”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号