首页> 外文期刊>Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology >The Rise and Fall of the Thiazolidinediones: Impact of Clinical Evidence Publication and Formulary Change on the Prescription Incidence of Thiazolidinediones
【24h】

The Rise and Fall of the Thiazolidinediones: Impact of Clinical Evidence Publication and Formulary Change on the Prescription Incidence of Thiazolidinediones

机译:噻唑烷二酮类化合物的兴衰:临床证据的公布和配方变化对噻唑烷二酮类处方发生率的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Numerous factors affect drug utilization including clinical trials, promotional activity, drug safety signals and funding practices. We sought to investigate the impact of cardiovascular safety concerns and public drug formulary restrictions on the use of the thiazolidinediones (TZDs): rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Methods We conducted a population-based cross-sectional time series analysis among more than 1.6 million older residents of Ontario, Canada using administrative healthcare claims databases from January 2000 to September 2010 to examine the impact of two events on the rate of initiation of TZDs among those aged 66 years and older: 1) the publication of a prominent meta-analysis suggesting cardiovascular harm for rosiglitazone, and 2) the introduction of prescribing restrictions for TZDs on the public formulary. Results Incident rosiglitazone prescribing decreased significantly from 5.32 to 0.44 prescriptions per 1,000 patients in the quarter following the publication of a meta-analysis, suggesting safety concerns for rosiglitazone (p<0.01). Similarly, incident pioglitazone prescribing continued to decline from 1.89 just prior to the publication of the meta-analysis to 0.53 prescriptions per 1,000 patients just prior to the policy implementation (p<0.01). Following the implementation of formulary restrictions for TZDs in Q2 of 2009, the rate of incident prescriptions for rosiglitazone fell further, from 0.20 prescriptions per 1,000 patients in the preceding quarter to 0.03 prescriptions per 1,000 patients in the subsequent quarter (Q3 of 2009; p<0.01). The rate of prescriptions dispensed for pioglitazone also decreased from 0.53 in Q1of 2009 to 0.11 prescriptions per 1,000 patients in Q3 of 2009 (p <0.01). Conclusion Both the publication of clinical evidence and drug policy changes can significantly influence the utilization of the TZDs.
机译:背景技术许多因素都会影响药物利用,包括临床试验,促销活动,药物安全信号和资助实践。我们试图调查心血管安全问题和公共药物制剂限制对噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs)的使用的影响:罗格列酮和吡格列酮。方法我们使用2000年1月至2010年9月的行政医疗索赔数据库,对加拿大安大略省160万以上的老年人进行了基于人口的横断面时间序列分析,研究了两个事件对TZD发生率的影响。年龄在66岁及以上的人群:1)发表了重要的荟萃分析,暗示罗格列酮对心血管有危害,2)引入了公共处方中对TZD的处方限制。结果在进行荟萃分析后,本季度发生的罗格列酮事件处方从每1000名患者的5.32处方大幅下降至0.44处方,这表明对罗格列酮的安全性存在担忧(p <0.01)。同样,吡格列酮事件的处方药从荟萃分析发布前的1.89持续下降到政策实施之前的每1,000名患者0.53处方(p <0.01)。在2009年第2季度实施TZD处方限制之后,罗格列酮的事件处方率进一步下降,从上一季度每1,000名患者0.20份处方下降到下一季度每1,000名患者0.03份处方(2009年第三季度; p < 0.01)。吡格列酮的处方率也从2009年第一季度的0.53下降到2009年第三季度每千名患者的0.11处方(p <0.01)。结论临床证据的公布和药物政策的变化都可以显着影响TZD的利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号