首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences >A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CHARACTERISTICS OF PECTINS FROM VARIOUS FRUIT PEEL WASTES EXTRACTED USING ACID AND MICROBIAL ENZYMES
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CHARACTERISTICS OF PECTINS FROM VARIOUS FRUIT PEEL WASTES EXTRACTED USING ACID AND MICROBIAL ENZYMES

机译:酸和微生物酶法提取各种果皮果胶中果胶特性的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The potential of microbial enzyme-aided extraction of pectin from fruit processing wastes was evaluated to assess its possible use as an environment friendly alternative to acid extraction methods. Peel wastes from yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Slims var. ?avicarpa), ‘Saba’ banana (Musa ‘saba’ [Musa acuminata x Musa balbisiana]), ‘Carabao’mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Carabao’) and soursop ‘guyabano’(Annona muricata) were extracted of pectin using different microbial enzymes namely cellulase, xylanase, pectinase and α-amylase. The efficiency of the enzymatic extraction as well as pectin quality were compared with acid extraction. Generally, high yields were obtained using cellulase and α-amylase. The yields from enzymatic extractions were however significantly lower compared with the acid extraction. Highest yields were obtained from ‘Carabao’ mango peels. The chemical properties of the pectins extracted from the fruit peels highly varied depending on the fruit and the extraction method. Pectin from yellow passion fruit peels was classified as low methoxyl (LM) based on the degree of esterification values while the rest of the pectins were classified as high methoxyl(HM). Analyses of the anhydrouronic acid (AUA) content showed that ‘Carabao’ mango peel pectins had high purity while the pectins from the other fruits had low purities. Equivalent weights of the fruit peel pectins from microbial extraction were significantly higher than that from acid extraction and from commercial citrus peel pectin. ‘Carabao’mango, ‘Saba’ banana, yellow passion fruit and soursop ‘guyabano’ peels are potential sources of pectin for food applications. Acid extraction was found to be more efficient compared with microbial enzyme-aided extraction.
机译:评估了从水果加工废料中微生物酶辅助提取果胶的潜力,以评估其作为酸提取方法的环境替代品的可能用途。黄色百香果(Passiflora edulis Slims var.?avicarpa)、'Saba'香蕉(Musa'saba'[Musa acuminata x Musa balbisiana]),'Carabao'mango(Mangifera indica L.cv.'Carabao')和使用不同的微生物酶,即纤维素酶,木聚糖酶,果胶酶和α-淀粉酶,从果胶中提取刺果'guyabano'(番荔枝番荔枝)。将酶提取的效率以及果胶质量与酸提取进行了比较。通常,使用纤维素酶和α-淀粉酶可获得高产量。然而,与酸提取相比,酶提取的产率明显较低。从“ Carabao”芒果皮中获得最高产量。从果皮中提取的果胶的化学性质根据水果和提取方法的不同而有很大差异。基于百香果酯化程度,黄色百香果皮的果胶被分类为低甲氧基(LM),而其余果胶则被分类为高甲氧基(HM)。氨基糖醛酸含量的分析表明,“ Carabao”芒果皮果胶的纯度高,而其他水果的果胶的纯度低。微生物提取的果皮果胶的当量明显高于酸提取和商业柑桔皮果胶的当量。 “ Carabao”芒果,“ Saba”香蕉,黄色百香果和刺参“ guyabano”果皮是食品中果胶的潜在来源。发现酸提取比微生物酶辅助提取更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号