首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Three-dimensional assessment of transverse displacement with Facemask and Maxgym in unilateral cleft lip and palate model
【24h】

Three-dimensional assessment of transverse displacement with Facemask and Maxgym in unilateral cleft lip and palate model

机译:单侧唇left裂模型中使用面罩和Maxgym进行横向位移的三维评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Growing patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) exhibit maxillary deficiency due to early surgical intervention. Maxillary protraction with expansion is the recommended treatment modality for deficient maxilla. Facemask is a conventional protraction appliance, and Maxgym is a new protraction appliance. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Maxgym with Facemask using finite-element analysis. Methods: A three-dimensional finite-element model consisting of 49,807 nodes and 185,620 tetrahedral-shaped elements was created using computed tomography scan of a patient with unilateral CLP. F1, F2, and F3 represent different protraction forces of facemask, and M1, M2, and M3 represent different protraction forces of Maxgym. E1 represents slow maxillary expansion (SME) force, and E2 represents rapid maxillary expansion (RME) force. Facemask and Maxgym forces were applied parallel to the occlusal plane from the middle of the clinical crown on the buccal side of the first premolars. The forces E1 and E2 were also applied on the middle of the crown height on the lingual side of the first premolars and the first molars to simulate expansion. The amount of displacement for Maxgym and Facemask forces in transverse direction was analyzed designating specific nodes to represent dental and skeletal structures. Results: The dental and skeletal structures were displaced in transverse direction under all loading conditions. Only expansion or protraction force resulted in transverse displacement of nodes. RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to SME. Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask. Maxgym with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to Maxgym with SME, whereas facemask with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with SME. Conclusions: Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with or without expansion.
机译:背景:由于早期手术干预,正在成长的唇left裂(CLP)患者表现出上颌骨缺损。上颌前伸扩张术是上颌骨不足的推荐治疗方法。面罩是传统的推拉器具,而Maxgym是新的推拉器具。这项研究的目的是使用有限元分析比较Maxgym和Facemask的功效。方法:使用计算机断层扫描技术对单侧CLP患者进行三维三维有限元建模,该模型包含49,807个节点和185,620个四面体形状的元素。 F1,F2和F3表示面罩的不同伸出力,而M1,M2和M3表示Maxgym的不同伸出力。 E1代表上颌缓慢扩张(SME)力,E2代表上颌快速扩张(RME)力。从第一前磨牙颊侧的临床牙冠中央平行于咬合面施加面罩和Maxgym力。力E1和E2也施加在第一前磨牙和第一磨牙舌侧的冠高中间。分析了Maxgym和Facemask力在横向方向上的位移量,指定了代表牙齿和骨骼结构的特定节点。结果:在所有载荷条件下,牙齿和骨骼结构在横向方向上均发生位移。仅膨胀力或伸出力导致结节的横向位移。与SME相比,RME产生更大的横向位移。与面罩相比,Maxgym力产生更大的横向位移。与带有SME的Maxgym相比,带有RME的Maxgym产生更大的横向位移,而与带有SME的面罩相比,带有RME的面罩产生更大的横向位移。结论:与具有或不具有膨胀的面罩相比,Maxgym力产生更大的横向位移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号