首页> 外文期刊>Vojnosanitetski Pregled >Analgesic efficacy and safety of four different anesthesia/postoperative analgesia protocols in patients following total hip arthroplasty
【24h】

Analgesic efficacy and safety of four different anesthesia/postoperative analgesia protocols in patients following total hip arthroplasty

机译:全髋关节置换术后四种不同麻醉/术后镇痛方案的镇痛效果和安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aim. Hip replacement surgery can initiate significant postoperative pain caused by bone alterations, implant, and soft tissue or nerve injuries. Postoperative analgesia using regional techniques has been shown to have numerous advantages over the intravenous use of morphine. However, numerous side effects and complications of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia have been reported recently. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to investigate whether continuous lumbar plexus block can be a safe and efficacious alternative for postoperative analgesia in comparison with epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (PCA morphine) for hip arthroplasty. Methods. This prospective study included 60 patients, scheduled for total hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: the group central nerve block – epidural (CNB), the group peripheral nerve block – lumbar plexus block (PNB), the group spinal anesthesia-PCA morphine (SAM) and the group general anesthesia-PCA morphine (GAM). The quality of analgesia and side effects (hypotension, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention) were recorded in all groups at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery. Pain scores were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), both at rest and on moving. Results. Our findings demonstrated that the use of a continuous lumbar plexus block provides effective analgesia at rest and on moving, during 24 h after hip arthroplasty. Pain scores varied significantly among the groups 4 h postoperatively (F = 21.827; p < 0.01), 12 h postoperatively (F = 41.925; p < 0.01) and 24 h postoperatively (F = 33.768; p < 0.01) with the highest scores ≥ 3 in the GAM group. Patients from the PNB group had satisfactory analgesia, comparable with patients from the CNB group. The incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the PNB group 12 h after the operation (χ2 = 9.712; p < 0.01). The incidence of urine retention was significantly different 12 h after the operation, with a presence only in the CNB group, with the incidence of 33.3% (χ2 = 16.365; p < 0.01). In all studied groups, the incidence of hypotension was not significantly different postoperatively. Conclusion. Administration of postoperative analgesia using continuous lumbar plexus block produces satisfactory analgesia with a low incidence of side effects when compared to epidural analgesia or parenteral opioids following hip arthroplasty.
机译:背景/目标。髋关节置换手术可能会引起严重的术后疼痛,该疼痛是由骨骼改变,植入物以及软组织或神经损伤引起的。与使用吗啡相比,使用局部技术进行术后镇痛已显示出许多优势。然而,最近已经报道了术后持续硬膜外镇痛的许多副作用和并发症。这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是研究与硬膜外镇痛和吗啡(PCA吗啡)患者自控镇痛相比,连续腰丛神经阻滞是否可作为术后镇痛的安全有效替代方法。方法。该前瞻性研究包括60例计划进行全髋关节置换术的患者。患者随机分为4组:中枢神经阻滞–硬膜外(CNB)组,周围神经阻滞–腰丛神经阻滞(PNB),脊柱麻醉-PCA吗啡(SAM)组和全身麻醉-PCA吗啡组( GAM)。在手术后4小时,12小时和24小时记录所有组的镇痛质量和副作用(低血压,恶心,呕吐,尿retention留)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估静止和运动时的疼痛评分。结果。我们的研究结果表明,在髋关节置换术后24小时内,连续使用腰丛神经阻滞可在休息和运动时提供有效的镇痛作用。术后4 h(F = 21.827; p <0.01),术后12 h(F = 41.925; p <0.01)和术后24 h(F = 33.768; p <0.01)组的疼痛评分差异显着,≥ GAM组中的3。与CNB组患者相比,PNB组患者的镇痛效果令人满意。术后12 h,PNB组恶心的发生率显着降低(χ2= 9.712; p <0.01)。术后12 h尿retention留的发生率显着不同,仅CNB组存在,发生率为33.3%(χ2= 16.365; p <0.01)。在所有研究组中,术后低血压的发生率无显着差异。结论。与髋关节置换术后硬膜外镇痛或肠胃外阿片类药物相比,使用连续腰丛神经阻滞进行术后镇痛的效果令人满意,且副作用发生率低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号