首页> 外文期刊>Universal Journal of Clinical Medicine >Electronic Prescribing: An Examination of Cost Effectiveness, Clinician Adoption and Limitations
【24h】

Electronic Prescribing: An Examination of Cost Effectiveness, Clinician Adoption and Limitations

机译:电子处方:成本效益,临床医生采用和限制的检查

获取原文
           

摘要

E-prescribing has flourished due to the promise of improving efficiency and decreasing prescription errors caused by its handwritten counterpart, yet only 44% of doctor’s offices use paperless prescriptions. Many studies have assessed the value of e-prescribing in the clinical setting, yet there is no all-inclusive summation of these findings. The aim of this study was to review the literature within the last decade pertaining to the cost effectiveness, clinician adoption and limitations of e-prescribing. Journal articles from January 1, 2003 through May 1, 2013 were compiled through use of the search engines: PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), and Google Scholar. A total of 56 peer-reviewed articles were included in this review. Trends show that most clinicians view e-prescribing positively despite some limitations. Limitations of e-prescribing include cost of implementation and maintenance, insufficient training, and lack of standardization. The cost to implement an integrated system with alerts and decision support is $29,000 per physician for the first year and $4,000 every year thereafter. Furthermore, e-prescribing has little disruption to workflow and no statistically significant increase in processing time. Although limitations exist, an expansion of e-prescribing is expected in the future. Efforts should be increased to promote clinicians adopting e-prescribing.
机译:由于可以提高效率并减少手写的处方引起的处方错误,因此电子处方蓬勃发展,但医生办公室中只有44%使用无纸处方。许多研究已经评估了电子处方在临床中的价值,但尚无这些发现的全面总结。这项研究的目的是回顾过去十年中有关成本效益,临床医生采用和电子处方的局限性的文献。通过使用以下搜索引擎来编辑2003年1月1日至2013年5月1日之间的期刊文章:PubMed,International Pharmaceutical Abstracts(IPA)和Google Scholar。本评价共纳入56篇经同行评审的文章。趋势表明,尽管有一些限制,但大多数临床医生都对电子处方持积极态度。电子处方的局限性包括实施和维护的成本,培训不足和缺乏标准化。实施带有警报和决策支持的集成系统的费用,第一年为每位医生29,000美元,其后每年为4,000美元。此外,电子处方对工作流程的干扰很小,并且处理时间没有统计学上的显着增加。尽管存在局限性,但未来有望扩大电子处方。应加大力度促进临床医生采用电子处方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号