...
【24h】

The Politics of Knowledge in Policy Analysis

机译:政策分析中的知识政治

获取原文
           

摘要

From a politics of assimilation to a politics of recognition (Coulthard, 2007), within and as a result of state policies, Canada’s Indigenous peoples and Indigenous knowledge systems are in a better position to contribute to public policy processes. Unfortunately, reflecting the power imbalance in our policy-making system, Indigenous people tend to be receivers of government policies instead of contributors to public policy (Abele, 2006). Furthermore, there is little to no evidence that Indigenous knowledge systems have received meaningful inclusion in public policy development, especially outside of lands and resources policy (Dudgeon and Berkes, 2003). As a result, public policy discourse in Canada has been and continues to be shaped and dominated by Western perspectives, which hold to a colonial model of governance and policy making (Graham et al., 1996).
机译:从同化政治到承认政治(Coulthard,2007),在国家政策之内和作为国家政策的结果,加拿大的土著人民和土著知识体系在为公共政策流程做出贡献方面处于更有利的位置。不幸的是,由于反映了我们决策系统中的权力失衡,土著人民往往是政府政策的接受者,而不是公共政策的贡献者(Abele,2006)。此外,几乎没有证据表明土著知识体系已被有意义地纳入公共政策制定之中,特别是在土地和资源政策之外(Dudgeon和Berkes,2003年)。结果,加拿大的公共政策话语已经并且继续受到西方观点的塑造和支配,西方观点坚持了殖民统治的治理和政策制定模式(Graham等,1996)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号