首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >Technical analysis contestation and politics in policy agenda setting and implementation: the rise and fall of primary care maternal services from Ghana’s capitation policy
【2h】

Technical analysis contestation and politics in policy agenda setting and implementation: the rise and fall of primary care maternal services from Ghana’s capitation policy

机译:技术议程制定和实施过程中的技术分析争论和政治:加纳的人道政策导致初级保健孕产妇服务的兴衰

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundWhy issues get on the policy agenda, move into policy formulation and implementation while others drop off in the process is an important field of enquiry to inform public social policy development and implementation. This paper seeks to advance our understanding of health policy agenda setting, formulation and implementation processes in Ghana, a lower middle income country by exploring how and why less than three months into the implementation of a pilot prior to national scale up; primary care maternal services that were part of the basket of services in a primary care per capita national health insurance scheme provider payment system dropped off the agenda.
机译:背景为什么问题进入政策议程,进入政策制定和实施过程,而其他问题却在此过程中落下,这是为公共社会政策制定和实施提供信息的重要调查领域。本文试图探索在加纳国家试点实施之前不到三个月的方式和原因,以加深我们对中低收入国家加纳卫生政策议程制定,制定和实施过程的理解;人均国民健康保险计划提供者支付体系中属于基本服务的一揽子服务中的基本服务孕产妇服务已不在议程之列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号