...
首页> 外文期刊>Research Involvement and Engagement >Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders’ experiences
【24h】

Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders’ experiences

机译:使用参与式学习行动(PLA)研究技术在初级医疗保健中与利益相关方之间的对话:对利益相关方经验的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Plain English summaryIt is important for health care workers to know the needs and expectations of their patients. Therefore, service users have to be involved in research. To achieve a meaningful dialogue between service users, healthcare workers and researchers, participatory methods are needed. This paper describes how the application of a specific participatory methodology, Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) can lead to such a meaningful dialogue. In PLA all stakeholders are regarded as equal partners and collaborators in research.During 2011–2015, a European project called RESTORE used PLA in Austria, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and the UK to investigate how communication between primary health care workers and their migrant patients could be improved.Seventy eight migrants, interpreters, doctors, nurses and other key stakeholders (see Table 2) participated in 62 PLA sessions. These dialogues (involving discussions, activities, PLA techniques and evaluations) were generally 2–3?h long and were recorded and analysed by the researchers.Participants reported many positive experiences about their dialogues with other stakeholders. There was a positive, trusting atmosphere in which all stakeholders could express their views despite differences in social power. This made for better understanding within and across stakeholder groups. For instance a doctor changed her view on the use of interpreters after a migrant explained why this was important. Negative experiences were rare: some doctors and healthcare workers thought the PLA sessions took a lot of time; and despite the good dialogue, there was disappointment that very few migrants used the new interpreting service. Background In order to be effective, primary healthcare must understand the health needs, values and expectations of the population it serves. Recent research has shown that the involvement of service users and other stakeholders and gathering information on their perspectives can contribute positively to many aspects of primary healthcare. Participatory methodologies have the potential to support engagement and dialogue between stakeholders from academic, migrant community and health service settings. This paper focuses on a specific participatory research methodology, Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) in which all stakeholders are regarded as equal partners and collaborators in research.Our research question for this paper was: "Does the application of PLA lead to meaningful engagement of all stakeholders, and if so, what elements contribute to a positive and productive inter-stakeholder dialogue?". Methods We explored the use of PLA in RESTORE, a European FP7-funded project, during 2011–2015 in 5 countries: Austria, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK. The objective of RESTORE was to investigate and support the implementation of guidelines and training initiatives (G/TIs) to enhance communication in cross-cultural primary care consultations with migrants.Seventy eight stakeholders (migrants, interpreters, doctors, nurses and others – see Table?2) participated in a total of 62 PLA sessions (discussions, activities, evaluations) of approximately 2–3?h’ duration across the five sites. During the fieldwork, qualitative data were generated about stakeholders’ experiences of engagement in this dialogue, by means of various methods including participatory evaluations, researchers’ fieldwork reports and researcher interviews. These were analysed following the principles of thematic analysis. Results Stakeholders involved in PLA inter-stakeholder dialogues reported a wide range of positive experiences of engagement, and very few negative experiences. A positive atmosphere during early research sessions helped to create a sense of safety and trust. This enabled stakeholders from very different backgrounds, with different social status and power, to offer their perspectives in a way that led to enhanced learning in the group – they learned with and from each other. This fostered shifts in understanding – for example, a doctor changed her view on interpreted consultations because of the input of the migrant service-users. Conclusion PLA successfully promoted stakeholder involvement in meaningful and productive inter-stakeholder dialogues. This makes it an attractive approach to enhance the further development of health research partnerships to advance primary healthcare.
机译:简洁的英语摘要对于医护人员来说,了解患者的需求和期望很重要。因此,服务用户必须参与研究。为了在服务使用者,医护人员和研究人员之间进行有意义的对话,需要采用参与式方法。本文描述了特定的参与式方法论,参与式学习与行动(PLA)的应用如何导致这种有意义的对话。在PLA中,所有利益相关者都被视为研究的平等伙伴和合作者。在2011-2015年期间,一个名为RESTORE的欧洲项目在奥地利,希腊,爱尔兰,荷兰和英国使用PLA来调查初级卫生保健工作者及其移民之间的沟通方式可以改善患者。八十二名移民,口译员,医生,护士和其他主要利益相关者(见表2)参加了62次解放军会议。这些对话(包括讨论,活动,PLA技术和评估)通常持续2–3小时,并由研究人员记录和分析。参与者报告了与其他利益相关者对话的许多积极经验。在积极,互信的气氛中,尽管社会力量有所差异,所有利益相关者仍可以表达自己的观点。这使利益相关者群体内部和之间有了更好的理解。例如,在移民解释了为什么重要的原因后,医生改变了对口译人员使用的看法。负面经验很少见:一些医生和医护人员认为解放军会议花费了很多时间。尽管对话良好,但令人失望的是,很少有移民使用新的口译服务。背景为了有效,初级卫生保健必须了解其所服务人群的健康需求,价值和期望。最近的研究表明,服务使用者和其他利益相关者的参与以及从他们的角度收集信息可以对基础医疗的许多方面做出积极的贡献。参与式方法有可能支持来自学术界,移民社区和卫生服务机构的利益相关者之间的参与和对话。本文着眼于一种特殊的参与式研究方法,即参与式学习与行动(PLA),在该方法中,所有利益相关者被视为研究的平等伙伴和合作者。所有利益攸关方,如果是的话,哪些因素有助于利益攸关方之间积极和富有成效的对话?”。方法我们在2011–2015年间探索了PLA在欧洲FP7资助的项目RESTORE中的使用情况,该项目在5个国家/地区:奥地利,希腊,爱尔兰,荷兰和英国。 RESTORE的目的是调查和支持准则和培训计划(G / TI)的实施,以加强与移民的跨文化初级保健咨询中的​​沟通。七十八个利益相关者(移民,口译,医生,护士等)–参见表?2)在五个地点总共进行了62场PLA活动(讨论,活动,评估),持续时间约2-3h。在实地调查期间,通过包括参与性评估,研究人员的实地调查报告和研究人员访谈在内的各种方法,生成了有关利益相关者参与此对话的经验的定性数据。这些是按照主题分析的原则进行分析的。结果参与PLA利益相关者之间对话的利益相关者报告了广泛的积极参与经验,很少有负面经验。早期研究会议期间的积极气氛有助于建立安全感和信任感。这使来自不同背景,具有不同社会地位和权力的利益相关者能够以一种能够增强小组学习能力的方式提出自己的观点,即他们彼此学习。这促进了理解上的转变-例如,由于移民服务使用者的投入,医生改变了对解释性咨询的看法。结论中国人民解放军成功地促进了利益相关者参与有意义的,富有成效的利益相关者之间的对话。这使其成为一种有吸引力的方法,可以增强健康研究合作伙伴关系的进一步发展,从而促进基本医疗保健。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号