首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study
【24h】

Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study

机译:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸不同凸度的胸腰/腰腰曲线之间主动脉撞击风险的比较:计算机断层扫描研究

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeTo compare the positions of the aorta relative to vertebral bodies and the potential risk of the aorta impingement for pedicle screw (PS) placement between right-sided and left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).MethodsThirty-nine AIS patients with a main thoracolumbar or lumbar curve were recruited. The Lenke’s classification was type 5C in all patients. According to the convexity of the thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, the patients were divided into either group R or Group L. The patients in Group R had a main right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve, and the patients in Group L had a main left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Axial CT images from T12 to L4 at the midvertebral body level were obtained to evaluate Aorta-vertebra angle (α), Vertebral rotation angle (β), Lefty safety distance (LSD), and Right safety distance (RSD). The risks of the aorta impingement from T12 to L4 were calculated and then compared between the two groups.ResultsThe α increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L1, and then decreased from L1 through L4 in Group L. The β decreased from T12 through L4 in both groups. The LSD constantly increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L3, and then decreased from L3 through L4 in Group L. The RSD increased from T12 through L3 and then decreased from L3 through L4 in both groups. With the increment of the lengths of the simulated screws, the aorta impingement risks were constantly elevated at all levels in both groups. The aorta was at a high risk of impingement from left PS regardless of the diameters of the simulated screws in Group R (80–100?% at T12 and 53.3–100?% at L1). In Group L, the aorta was completely safe when using 35?mm (0 at all levels) PS and at high risks of the aorta impingement on the right side from 45?mm PSs (31.8–72.7?%). In all, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS in Group R and from right PS in Group L, and the risk of the aorta impingement from PS placement was generally higher in right thoracolumbar or lumbar curves when compared with that of the left.ConclusionsThe present study illustrated different changed positions of the aorta relative to vertebrae between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities. In right-sided curve, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS while in left-sided curves, from right PS. The aorta was more proximal to entry points in right-sided lumbar curve when compared with left-sided curve; thus placing PS carries more risks in right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Surgeons should be more cautious when placing PSs on the concave sides of T12 and L1 vertebrae of right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves...
机译:目的比较青春期特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)左右两侧胸廓/腰部曲线之间主动脉相对于椎体的位置以及主动脉撞击椎弓根螺钉(PS)的潜在风险。方法三十九招募了主胸腰椎或腰椎弯曲的患者。所有患者的Lenke分类均为5C型。根据胸腰椎或腰椎曲线的凸度,将患者分为R组或L组。R组的患者具有主要的右侧胸腰椎/腰部曲线,L组的患者具有主要的左胸腰椎/腰椎曲线。两侧胸腰/腰曲线。从T12到L4在椎体中部水平获取轴向CT图像,以评估主动脉-椎骨角度(α),椎骨旋转角度(β),左手安全距离(LSD)和右手安全距离(RSD)。计算两组之间的主动脉从T12撞击L4的风险,然后进行比较。结果R组中α从T12到L4升高,从T12到L1升高,然后从L1到L4降低。两组从T12到L4均下降。 R组中LSD从T12到L4不断增加,从T12到L3不断增加,然后在L组中从L3到L4不断下降。两组的RSD从T12到L3增加,然后从L3到L4下降。随着模拟螺钉长度的增加,两组的主动脉撞击风险都在不断增加。不论R组中模拟螺钉的直径如何,主动脉受到左PS撞击的风险很高(T12为80-100%,L1为53.3-100%)。在L组中,当使用35?mm(所有水平为0)PS时,主动脉是完全安全的,并且从45?mm PS(31.8–72.7%)的右侧发生主动脉撞击的风险很高。总体而言,主动脉撞击的风险主要来自R组的左PS和L组的右PS,与右胸腰椎或腰椎弯曲相比,PS放置引起的主动脉撞击的风险通常较高。结论本研究表明胸腰/腰部曲线之间具有不同凸度的主动脉相对于椎骨的位置发生了变化。在右侧曲线中,主动脉撞击的风险主要来自左侧PS,而在左侧曲线中,来自右侧PS。与左侧曲线相比,主动脉更靠近右侧腰部曲线的进入点;因此,放置PS会在右侧胸腰/腰部曲线中带来更多风险。将PS放置在右侧胸腰/腰曲线的T12和L1椎骨的凹入侧时,外科医生应该更加谨慎...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号