首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Bupivacaine constant continuous surgical wound infusion versus continuous epidural infusion for post cesarean section pain, randomized placebo-controlled study
【24h】

Bupivacaine constant continuous surgical wound infusion versus continuous epidural infusion for post cesarean section pain, randomized placebo-controlled study

机译:布比卡因持续连续手术伤口输注与硬膜外持续输注治疗剖宫产后疼痛的比较,随机安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Cesarean section is considered as one of the most commonly done surgical procedures, which have a rising rate of performance. Postoperative pain may lead to poor patient satisfaction and interfere with early rehabilitation. Increasing evidence is now suggesting that less invasive regional analgesic techniques may be as beneficial as epidural analgesia. This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety and side effect of bupivacaine continuous wound infusion using constant flow PainFusor system with epidural infusion for post-cesarean section analgesia. Methods 60 patients, ASA physical status I & II, aged 19–42 years, with full-term pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean section were randomly divided into two groups. All patients enrolled in the study performed cesarean section under standardized protocol of general anesthesia. Group A patients received continuous surgical wound infiltration, while group B patients received bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion. Pain was assessed using Visual analogue scale (VAS). Diclofenac sodium 75 mg was administered IM as a rescue analgesic. Results The current study showed no significant difference between the two groups in the hemodynamic parameters, respiratory parameters as well as pain scores at rest during the whole period of study. Side effects were statistically non-significant, and only patients who requested analgesia were significantly higher in group A. Furthermore, pain VAS scores on mobilization were significantly lower in group B during the first postoperative day. Conclusion The current study demonstrated that bupivacaine administered by continuous epidural infusion provided a significantly lower pain scores with mobilization, and hence better analgesia for post cesarean section pain in the first postoperative day compared to continuous bupivacaine wound infusion through fenestrated catheter using the constant flow PainFusor system.
机译:背景剖宫产被认为是最常用的手术方法之一,其性能不断提高。术后疼痛可能会导致患者满意度差并干扰早期康复。现在越来越多的证据表明,侵入性较小的局部镇痛技术可能与硬膜外镇痛一样有益。本研究旨在比较采用恒定流量PainFusor系统与硬膜外输注的布比卡因连续伤口输注对剖宫产后镇痛的疗效,安全性和副作用。方法将60例ASA身体状况I和II级,年龄19-42岁,足月妊娠并行选择性剖宫产的患者随机分为两组。参加研究的所有患者均在标准全身麻醉方案下进行剖宫产。 A组患者接受手术伤口连续浸润,而B组患者接受布比卡因持续硬膜外输注。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛。即时给予75mg双氯芬酸钠作为急救镇痛药。结果目前的研究表明,在整个研究过程中,两组的血液动力学参数,呼吸参数以及静止时的疼痛评分均无显着差异。副作用在统计学上无统计学意义,A组仅要求镇痛的患者显着较高。此外,术后第一天,B组动员时的疼痛VAS评分显着降低。结论目前的研究表明,与使用恒定流量PainFusor系统通过有孔导管连续布比卡因伤口输注相比,通过连续硬膜外输注给予布比卡因可显着降低动员时的疼痛评分,因此术后第一天对剖宫产后疼痛的镇痛效果更好。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号