首页> 外文期刊>Indonesian Research Journal in Education: IRJE >The Development of Reflective Thinking in the First Six Years of Teaching
【24h】

The Development of Reflective Thinking in the First Six Years of Teaching

机译:在教学的头六年中反思性思维的发展

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to investigate the development of reflective thinking in the first six years of a beginner teacher’s career. The qualitative study involved a beginner teacher of English in a primary school, who was selected on the basis of availability. Changes in reflective thinking by means of a structured reflective diary after three and six years were studied. In the reflective diary created at the end of the third and sixth years, the teacher had to answer the following questions: What am I doing well? Why? How do I know I have to do so? What do I have problems with? Why? Where do I make mistakes? What chances of development do I have? The processing of the diaries was done using content analysis, combining deductive and inductive logic. The basis of main codes and sub-codes was set up, also relying on triangulation. The reliability of coding was ensured by intra-coding. The results showed that after the third year, reflections appeared at a technical level, usually answering the question “what?”. After the sixth year, the reflections were more complex, and often dealt with insights about teachers’ activity. Besides “what?” questions “why?” and “how?” were in focus. The results have shown that during continuous reflection teachers may develop and improve a system combining theoretical and practical skills that can embrace the entirety of pedagogical work. The results show that continuous reflection contributes to the differentiation of pedagogical knowledge. The paper addresses those who are interested in the exploration, analysis, and development of reflective thinking.
机译:本文的目的是调查在初学者职业生涯的前六年中反思性思维的发展。定性研究涉及一所小学的英语初学者,该教师是根据可用性选择的。研究了三年和六年后通过结构化反思日记改变反思思维的方式。在第三和第六年末编写的反思日记中,老师必须回答以下问题:我做得如何?为什么?我怎么知道我必须这样做?我有什么问题?为什么?我在哪里犯错?我有什么发展机会?使用内容分析结合演绎和归纳逻辑对日记进行处理。建立了主代码和子代码的基础,也依赖于三角剖分。通过帧内编码来确保编码的可靠性。结果表明,第三年之后,在技术层面上出现了反思,通常回答“什么?”的问题。六年级以后,思考更加复杂,并且常常涉及对教师活动的见解。除了“什么?”问题“为什么?”如何?”成为焦点。结果表明,在连续反思过程中,教师可能会开发和完善一种将理论和实践技能相结合的体系,该体系可涵盖整个教学工作。结果表明,连续反思有助于教育学知识的分化。本文针对那些对探索性思维的探索,分析和发展感兴趣的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号