This article takes a double perspective – epistemological and bioethical – towards the object of specific study in social sciences research inv'/> The morality of research practice in the social sciences: epistemological and bioethical issues
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >The morality of research practice in the social sciences: epistemological and bioethical issues
【24h】

The morality of research practice in the social sciences: epistemological and bioethical issues

机译:社会科学中研究实践的道德:认识论和生物伦理学问题

获取原文
           

摘要

>This article takes a double perspective – epistemological and bioethical – towards the object of specific study in social sciences research involving human individuals and populations. The author focuses particularly on social sciences research in Brazil, referring to the descriptive, normative, and protective practice in the evaluation system developed by research ethics committees and the National Commission on Research Ethics (Conep). The article also highlights some of the inherent difficulties in the evaluator's role, confronted with the specificity of the object at hand and contingent on resistance by social sciences researchers when their research projects are evaluated according to norms derived from models referring to the morality of biomedical research. Finally, the article adopts a bioethical model based on the triple task – descriptive, prescriptive, and protective – called the bioethics of protection.
机译:> 这篇文章从认识论和生物伦理的角度对社会科学研究中涉及个人和人群的特定研究对象采取了双重观点。作者特别关注巴西的社会科学研究,指的是研究伦理委员会和国家研究伦理委员会(Conep)建立的评估体系中的描述性,规范性和保护性实践。文章还重点介绍了评估者角色中的一些固有困难,这些挑战面临着手头物体的特殊性,并取决于社会科学研究人员根据根据涉及生物医学研究道德的模型得出的规范对他们的研究项目进行评估时的抵抗力。最后,本文采用基于描述性,说明性和保护性三重任务的生物伦理学模型,即保护生物伦理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号