首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Private investments, public values: a value-based approach to argumenting for public support to the arts
【24h】

Private investments, public values: a value-based approach to argumenting for public support to the arts

机译:私人投资,公共价值:基于价值的方法论证公众对艺术的支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Support to private investments in culture has been subject to much attention lately due to the lack of public funds during the present economic crisis. Influenced by a neoliberal paradigm that emphasises market philosophy in the provision of public services, including arts and culture, mixed-funding economy is being acclaimed as an ideal, in that it depends on private funds to supplement public funds. It is often even claimed that private funds constitute a substitute for the lack of public support. Neoliberal cultural policy discourse, implemented through the instrumentalisation of culture, is based primarily on the use value of culture. In the present economic crisis, when all existing concepts come under question and when available empirical data show that private funding of culture is decreasing, many voices are calling for a rethinking of cultural policy. We show that private investment in culture is not unrelated to state support, and furthermore, that they are not even necessarily private, in the sense of pure market mechanisms. We suggest that they are driven by non-use values, and are therefore much more “public” than commonly thought and we provide arguments in favour of state support for the development of such mechanisms.View full textDownload full textKeywordsprivate investment, cultural sector, non-use values, contingent valuation, externalities, public goodsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.698552
机译:由于在当前经济危机期间缺乏公共资金,对私人对文化投资的支持最近引起了广泛关注。受新自由主义范式的影响,在提供包括艺术和文化在内的公共服务时强调市场哲学,混合资金经济被认为是理想的,因为它依靠私人资金来补充公共资金。人们甚至甚至声称,私人资金可以替代缺乏公共支持的情况。通过文化的工具化来实施的新自由主义文化政策话语主要基于文化的使用价值。在当前的经济危机中,当所有现有概念都受到质疑并且现有的经验数据表明对文化的私人资助正在减少时,许多声音呼吁对文化政策进行重新思考。我们表明,对文化的私人投资并非与国家支持无关,而且从纯粹的市场机制的意义上说,它们甚至不一定是私人的。我们建议它们是由非使用价值驱动的,因此比通常的想法更具“公共性”,并且我们提供了支持国家支持此类机制发展的论据。查看全文下载全文关键字私人投资,文化部门,非使用价值,或有估值,外部性,公共物品相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.698552

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号