首页> 外文学位 >Supporting the need: A comparative investigation of public and private arts endowments supporting state arts agencies.
【24h】

Supporting the need: A comparative investigation of public and private arts endowments supporting state arts agencies.

机译:支持需求:对支持国家艺术机构的公共和私人艺术基金会的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In American Canvas, Delaware's Arts Stabilization Fund (ArtCo) received national prominence as an innovate method to increase and leverage public and private dollars to support arts development at the state level. Arts endowment formation is not a new phenomenon, North Dakota and Montana both introduced endowments in the 1970s (Warshawski 1998, Barsdate 2000). Additionally, the parallel or companion foundation as endowment strategy also has a longstanding presence in public administration. The Indiana Endowment for the Arts, established in 1971, was among the first companion foundations at State Arts Agencies (SAAs) and became defunct in 1984. Additionally, the California Arts Council considered an endowment fund in the late 1960 but was advised against establishing it by consultants Adams & Goldbard (1978).; After the Culture War of the late 1980s to 1990s, SAAs sought to replace reduced federal appropriations as the National Endowment for the Arts's (NEA) funds were no longer available at prior high levels. Unlike in Delaware, most SAA fund development initiatives were created without adequate planning and infrastructural development. Some SAAs pursued passing legislation for their cultural trust endowments and cultural trust funds as in Delaware with ArtCo and in Indiana with the Indiana Cultural Trust Fund (ICTF), while other states developed and expanded companion foundations, 501 c3 organizations, as in Ohio. In 1998, Warshawski reported that nearly a quarter of the states had begun processes to establish arts trust funds and endowments. Within the past twenty years, federal cutbacks, national disaster, and international crisis resulted in more SAAs shifting their foci to their own stabilization and sustainability through public arts endowments (PAE) development.; This investigation is a collective case study of PAE that and reviews of arts management and fund development practices in Delaware, Ohio, and Indiana. Fund development policy and administration fall into three primary approaches that are: Collaborative Management in Delaware; Project Management in Ohio, and Policy Formation in Indiana. Multiple questions are addressed in this research to include: (1) How are PAE defined by SAA, (2) What organizational management and conceptual frames are being utilized in fund development by SAAs, and (3) Are policy and cultural heritage strategies are being used in program innovation and design to attract private donors? Additionally, several research areas are reviewed: (1) conceptual frames or organizational philosophy for trusts and endowment funds formation and implementation, (2) management views and approaches by policymakers and public arts administrators, (3) influences on program designs like Arts Education, Artists Services, Professional Development, Leadership Institutions, and workforce development, and (4) links between financial, social, intellectual, and human capital in endowment formation. Reassessment of technology and its related infrastructures are also essential components in the development of social and financial capital. Yet, technological capacity in fund development remains an issue for future investigation.; This research also introduces Social Pluralism as a conceptual frame to further group and individual understanding about how cultural heritage and individualism are synthesized through ethnic and socio-economic cultural lenses that are complete with group assessment, construction of new practices, and strategies for participating in domestic, international, and global context. Social Pluralism, as an strategic process and application, is based on four tenets: (1) social cooperation, (2) social construction, (3) entrepreneurism, and (4) cultural affirmation. The intent of Social Pluralism is to align operating strategies with administrative practices related to public administration.; Most SAAs share functions of being preserver, conveyor, arbitrator and researcher of culture in their states. As
机译:在美国画布上,特拉华州的艺术稳定基金(ArtCo)作为提高和利用公共和私人资金支持州一级艺术发展的创新方法而享誉全国。艺术end赋的形成并不是一个新现象,北达科他州和蒙大纳州都在1970年代引入了ments赋(Warshawski 1998,Barsdate 2000)。此外,平行或同伴基金会作为捐赠战略在公共行政中也有悠久的历史。印第安纳艺术基金会成立于1971年,是州艺术机构(SAA)最早成立的基金会之一,并于1984年不再使用。此外,加利福尼亚艺术委员会在1960年末考虑了一项捐赠基金,但建议不要设立该基金。顾问亚当斯和戈德巴德(1978)。在1980年代末至1990年代的文化大战之后,SAA试图取代减少的联邦拨款,因为国家艺术基金会(NEA)的资金已不再有以前的高水平。与特拉华州不同,大多数SAA基金开发计划都是在没有适当规划和基础设施开发的情况下制定的。一些SAA寻求通过有关其文化信托基金和文化信托基金的立法,例如在特拉华州与ArtCo,在印第安纳州与印第安纳文化信托基金(ICTF),而其他州则像俄亥俄州一样建立和扩展了501 c3组织的伙伴基金会。 1998年,沃肖斯基(Warshawski)报告说,将近四分之一的州已经开始建立艺术信托基金和捐赠基金。在过去的二十年中,联邦削减,国家灾难和国际危机导致更多SAA通过公共艺术捐赠(PAE)的发展将重点转移到自身的稳定和可持续性上。这项调查是PAE的集体案例研究,回顾了特拉华州,俄亥俄州和印第安纳州的艺术管理和基金开发实践。基金开发政策和管理分为三种主要方法:特拉华州的协作管理;俄亥俄州的项目管理和印第安纳州的政策形成。本研究解决了多个问题,其中包括:(1)SAA如何定义PAE,(2)SAA在资金开发中使用了哪些组织管理和概念框架,以及(3)是否正在制定政策和文化遗产策略?用于计划创新和设计以吸引私人捐助者?此外,还对以下几个研究领域进行了审查:(1)信托和捐赠基金的形成和实施的概念框架或组织哲学;(2)决策者和公共艺术管理者的管理观点和方法;(3)对诸如艺术教育等计划设计的影响;艺术家服务,专业发展,领导机构和劳动力发展,以及(4)formation赋形成中的财务,社会,知识和人力资本之间的联系。对技术及其相关基础设施的重新评估也是社会和金融资本发展的重要组成部分。但是,基金开发中的技术能力仍然是未来调查的问题。这项研究还引入了社会多元主义作为概念框架,以进一步通过民族和社会经济文化视角进一步向群体和个人理解如何综合文化遗产和个人主义,并进行群体评估,新实践的构建以及参与国内活动的策略。 ,国际和全球环境。社会多元化作为战略过程和应用,基于四个原则:(1)社会合作;(2)社会建设;(3)企业家精神;(4)文化主张。社会多元化的目的是使经营战略与与公共行政有关的行政惯例保持一致。大多数SAA担当着各自州的文化保护者,传播者,仲裁者和研究者的职能。如

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Keith D.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Art.; American Studies.; Business Administration Management.; Political Science Public Administration.; Sociology Social Structure and Development.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 384 p.
  • 总页数 384
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;政治理论;社会结构和社会关系;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号