...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Rabeprazole vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind study in urban Asia
【24h】

Rabeprazole vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind study in urban Asia

机译:雷贝拉唑与埃索美拉唑治疗非侵蚀性胃食管反流病:亚洲城市地区的一项随机,双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is becoming increasingly common in Asia. Data on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive GERD (NERD) in Asia is lacking. This double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole with esomeprazole in relief of symptoms in patients with NERD. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four patients with reflux symptoms of NERD and normal endoscopy were randomized to receive rabeprazole 10 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 wk. Symptoms were recorded in a diary and changes in severity of symptoms noted. RESULTS: At 4 wk of treatment, rabeprazole 10 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg were comparable with regards to the primary endpoint of time to achieve 24-h symptom-free interval for heartburn 8.5 d vs 9 d and regurgitation 6 d vs7.5 d. Rabeprazole and esomeprazole were also similarly efficacious in term of patient's global evaluation with 96% of patients on rabeprazole and 87.9% of patients on esomeprazole, reporting that symptoms improved (P= NS). Satisfactory relief of day- and night-time symptoms was achieved in 98% of patients receiving rabeprazole and 81.4% of patients receiving esomeprazole. Adverse events were comparable in both groups (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole 10 mg has a similar efficacy and safety profile in Asians with NERD as esomeprazole 20 mg. Further study is necessary to investigate whether the small differences between the two drugs seen in this study are related to the improved pharmacodynamic properties of rabeprazole. Both drugs were well tolerated.
机译:目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)在亚洲变得越来越普遍。缺乏有关亚洲非侵蚀性GERD(NERD)患者质子泵抑制剂疗效的数据。这项双盲研究比较了雷贝拉唑和埃索美拉唑缓解NERD患者症状的功效和安全性。方法:134例患有NERD反流症状且内镜正常的患者被随机分配接受雷贝拉唑10毫克或埃索美拉唑20毫克,每天一次,连续4周。在日记中记录症状,并记录症状严重程度的变化。结果:在治疗的第4周,雷贝拉唑10 mg和埃索美拉唑20 mg在实现胃灼热8.5 d vs 9 d和反流6 d vs 7.5 d的24小时无症状间隔的主要终点方面具有可比性。就患者的整体评估而言,雷贝拉唑和埃索美拉唑的疗效相似,有96%的雷贝拉唑患者和87.9%的埃索美拉唑患者报告症状有所改善(P = NS)。 98%的雷贝拉唑患者和81.4%的埃索美拉唑患者白天和夜间症状得到了令人满意的缓解。两组的不良事件相当(P = NS)。结论:雷贝拉唑10毫克在具有NERD的亚洲人中具有与埃索美拉唑20毫克相似的疗效和安全性。有必要进行进一步的研究,以研究本研究中发现的两种药物之间的细微差异是否与雷贝拉唑的药效学特性改善有关。两种药物均耐受良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号