首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology >The Techno-Fix Versus The Fair Cop: Procedural (In)Justice and Automated Speed Limit Enforcement
【24h】

The Techno-Fix Versus The Fair Cop: Procedural (In)Justice and Automated Speed Limit Enforcement

机译:技术修复与公平警察:程序性(内部)司法和自动限速执行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While the use of technology to monitor and punish suspected ‘risky’ populations is likely to increase, the experience of being on the receiving end of such enforcement has received relatively little attention. This paper presents research that considered one particular criminal justice ‘techno-fix’—the speed camera—from the perspective of those who encounter the technology as offenders. Such enforcement is commonly described by drivers as being ‘unfair’ and ‘unjust’. Speeding drivers’ experiences of being ‘techno-fixed’ are considered with reference to the antecedent elements of a procedurally just experience proposed by Tyler amongst others. Drivers’ preferences for fairer methods of speed limit enforcement are then analysed, before the potential for reconciling the ‘techno-fix’ with procedurally just enforcement is considered.
机译:虽然使用技术来监视和惩治可疑“危险”人群的可能性可能会增加,但是在这种执法的接受端上的经验却很少受到关注。本文提出了一些研究,从那些作为犯罪者遭遇技术的人的角度考虑了一种特定的刑事司法“技术手段”(即测速摄像机)。驾驶员通常将这种执法行为描述为“不公平”和“不公正”。提速驾驶员的“技术固定”体验,是参考泰勒(Tyler)等人提出的程序公正体验的前因要素而考虑的。然后,在考虑将“技术修复”与程序上仅强制执行进行协调的可能性之前,分析驾驶员对更合理的限速执行方法的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号