...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Simulations of pollutant dispersion within idealised urban-type geometries with CFD and integral models
【24h】

Simulations of pollutant dispersion within idealised urban-type geometries with CFD and integral models

机译:利用CFD和积分模型模拟理想化城市型几何结构内的污染物扩散

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Until recently, urban air quality modelling has been based on operational models of an integral nature. The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models to address the same problems is increasing rapidly. Operational models e.g. OSPM, AERMOD, ADMS-Urban have undergone many comprehensive formal evaluations as to their "fitness for purpose" while CFD models do not have such an evaluation record in the urban air quality context. This paper looks at the application of both approaches to common problems. In particular, pollutant dispersion from point and line sources in the simplest neutral atmospheric boundary layer and line sources placed within different regular building geometries is studied with the CFD code FLUENT and the atmospheric dispersion model ADMS-Urban. Both the effect of street canyons of different aspect ratios and various obstacle array configurations consisting of cubical buildings are investigated. The standard κ-ε turbulence model and the advection-diffusion (AD) method (in contrast to the Lagrangian particle tracking method) are used for the CFD simulations. Results from the two approaches are compared. Overall CFD simulations with the appropriate choice of coefficients produce similar concentration fields to those predicted by the integral approach. However, some quantitative differences are observed. These differences can be explained by investigating the role of the Schmidt number in the CFD simulations. A further interpretation of the differences between the two approaches is given by quantifying the exchange velocities linked to the mass fluxes between the in-canopy and above-canopy layers.
机译:直到最近,城市空气质量建模一直基于不可或缺的操作模型。用于解决相同问题的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型的使用正在迅速增加。操作模型,例如OSPM,AERMOD,ADMS-Urban已针对其“适用性”进行了许多全面的正式评估,而CFD模型在城市空气质量背景下没有这样的评估记录。本文着眼于两种方法在常见问题上的应用。特别是,使用CFD代码FLUENT和大气扩散模型ADMS-Urban研究了最简单的中性大气边界层中点和线源的污染物扩散以及放置在不同规则建筑物几何体中的线源的污染物扩散。研究了不同纵横比的街道峡谷的影响以及由立方体建筑物组成的各种障碍物阵列配置。 CFD模拟使用标准的κ-ε湍流模型和对流扩散(AD)方法(与拉格朗日粒子跟踪方法相反)。比较了两种方法的结果。带有适当系数选择的整体CFD模拟产生的浓度场与积分方法预测的浓度场相似。但是,观察到一些定量差异。这些差异可以通过研究Schmidt数在CFD模拟中的作用来解释。通过量化与冠层内层和冠层上层之间的质量通量相关的交换速度,可以进一步解释这两种方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号