首页> 外文期刊>Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. Section A, Sciences >Determination of Trace Level Perchlorate in Seawater Using Dispersive Solid‑Phase Extraction and Co‑precipitation Extraction with Layered Double Hydroxides Followed by Ion Chromatography Analysis
【24h】

Determination of Trace Level Perchlorate in Seawater Using Dispersive Solid‑Phase Extraction and Co‑precipitation Extraction with Layered Double Hydroxides Followed by Ion Chromatography Analysis

机译:分散式固相萃取和分层双氢氧化物的分散固相萃取和共析出萃取离子色谱分析,测定海水中痕量高氯酸盐的测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this manuscript, three-layered double hydroxides (LDH-CO_3~(2−), LDH-NO_3~−, and LDH-Cl~−) were synthesized and utilized as efficient sorbents for the extraction of perchlorate in water samples. Two different microextraction methods, namely dispersive solid-phase extraction (D-SPE) and co-precipitation extraction (Co-PE), were developed. Then performances of these methods were compared with previously reported in the literature. Analyses were performed using the ion chromatography (IC). The experimental conditions that affect the enrichment factor of the target analyte from the aqueous sample were investigated and optimized. The results showed (pH = 6) are the optimum for both methods. The Co-PE results demonstrated shorted extraction time (10 min) when compared to (20 min) D-SPE. After optimizing both methods, excellent linearity for the analyte in the range from 0.2 to 10 μg/L with coefficients of determination (r~2) from 0.992 to 0.997 is obtained. The limits of detection were calculated based on a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 3: For Co-PE, it was 0.04 μg/L, and for D-SPE, it was 0.06 μg/L. The limits of quantitation were calculated based on S/N of 10 and were 0.12 and 0.19 μg/L, respectively. Methods percentage relative standard deviations (n = 3), 2 for Co-PE and 2.2% for D-SPE were obtained. The relative recoveries (mean ± standard deviation, n = 3) of perchlorate from 5 μg/L spiked real seawater samples for the two extraction techniques D-SPE and Co-PE were between (89.5 and 102.3 ± 2-6.1%) and (86 to 99.8 ± 1.7-5.8%), respectively. The two extraction methods, coupled with IC, were used to the determination of perchlorate concentration in seawater samples from the different locations in Saudi Arabia. Overall, the D-SPE process demonstrated better analytical capability when compared to Co-SPE and other reported methods.
机译:在该原稿中,合成了三层双氢氧化物(LDH-CO_3〜(2-),LDH-NO_3〜 - 和LDH-CL〜 - ),并用作在水样中提取高氯酸盐的有效吸附剂。开发出两种不同的微萃取方法,即分散的固相萃取(D-SPE)和共析出萃取(CO-PE)。然后将这些方法的性能与先前在文献中进行了比较。使用离子色谱(IC)进行分析。研究了从水性样品中影响靶分析物的富集因子的实验条件。结果显示(pH = 6)是两种方法的最佳选择。与(20分钟)D-SPE相比,Co-PE结果显示出短路提取时间(10分钟)。优化两种方法后,获得0.2至10μg/ L的分析物的优异线性,得到0.992至0.997的测定系数(R〜2)的系数。基于3:对于CO-PE的信号 - 噪声(S / N)比计算检测限,为0.04μg/ L,对于D-SPE,为0.06μg/ L.基于10的S / N计算定量限,分别为0.12和0.19μg/ L.方法得到百分比相对标准偏差(n = 3),2的CO-PE和D-SPE的2.2%。对于两种提取技术D-SPE和CO-PE的5μg/ L尖刺真正的海水样品的高氯酸盐的相对回收(平均值±标准偏差,n = 3)在(89.5和102.3±2-6.1%之间)和(分别为86至99.8±1.7-5.8%)。两种萃取方法与IC偶联,用于在沙特阿拉伯不同地点测定海水样本中的高氯酸盐浓度。总的来说,与CO-SPE和其他报道的方法相比,D-SPE过程显示出更好的分析能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号