首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Influence of Irrigation and Fertigation on Fruit Composition, Vine Performance, and Water Relations of Concord and Niagara Grapevines
【24h】

Influence of Irrigation and Fertigation on Fruit Composition, Vine Performance, and Water Relations of Concord and Niagara Grapevines

机译:灌溉和施肥对康科德葡萄和尼亚加拉葡萄葡萄果实成分,葡萄性能和水分关系的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study was conducted between 1998 and 2002 to investigate the impact of different durations of irrigation and fertigation upon vine performance, fruit composition, and water relations of Concord and Niagara (Vitis labruscana) grapes in the Niagara Peninsula in Ontario and to quantify the degree of water stress that vineyards in the region typically experience. The six Concord treatments were a nonirrigated control, irrigation from budburst to veraison, and four fertigation treatments which applied 80 kg N/ha as urea. The nine Niagara treatments were a nonirrigated control, two irrigated treatments (ceasing at veraison and harvest, respectively), and six fertigation treatments of various durations. The modified FAO Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration formula was used in the final season to calculate water budgets and schedule irrigations. Transpiration rate and soil moisture data suggested that water stress was present in these vineyard blocks in 3 of 5 years of the study. The small transpiration differences between control and irrigated or fertigated treatments may have been due to early season irrigation increases in canopy size that led to later season water stress. Irrigation and fertigation led to enhanced berry set, larger berry size, increased vine size, and small increases in yield. Slight yield increases (~10% in Concord; 29% in Niagara) in irrigated and fertigated treatments were attributable to increased cluster numbers, cluster weights, and berry weights. In most seasons, yield increases were accompanied by small decreases in soluble solids (1.5 to 3.0 Brix) and methyl anthranilate concentrations. Timing of fertilizer application did not play a major role in any of these attributes. Use of the Penman-Monteith for irrigation scheduling needs to be evaluated over several seasons and validated using both plant and soil moisture monitoring.
机译:1998年至2002年之间进行了一项研究,以调查不同灌溉时间和施肥时间对安大略省尼亚加拉半岛的康科德和尼亚加拉(Vitis labruscana)葡萄的葡萄性能,果实成分和水关系的影响,并量化该地区葡萄园通常遇到的水分压力。六种Concord处理方法为非灌溉控制,从芽到苗期灌溉,以及四种施肥处理,分别以80 kg N / ha的尿素施用。尼亚加拉的9种处理方法是非灌溉控制,两种灌溉处理(分别在确证和收获时停止)和6种不同持续时间的施肥处理。在最后一个季节中使用修改后的粮农组织Penman-Monteith蒸散公式来计算水量预算并安排灌溉时间。蒸腾速率和土壤湿度数据表明,在研究的5年中,有3年中这些葡萄园区存在水分胁迫。对照和灌溉或施肥处理之间的蒸腾量差异很小,可能是由于早期灌溉增加了冠层大小,导致了后期的水分胁迫。灌溉和施肥导致浆果结实增强,浆果尺寸增大,葡萄藤尺寸增大以及单产增加很少。灌溉和施肥处理的单产略有增加(在康科德地区约为10%;在尼亚加拉地区为29%),这归因于簇数,簇重和浆果重的增加。在大多数季节中,产量增加都伴随着可溶性固体(1.5至3.0白利糖度)和邻氨基苯甲酸甲酯浓度的小幅下降。施肥的时机在所有这些属性中都不起作用。 Penman-Monteith用于灌溉计划的使用需要在多个季节进行评估,并使用植物和土壤湿度监测进行验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号