首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption
【2h】

A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption

机译:仿真研究比较网络荟萃分析的不同估计方法和评估一致性假设的相应方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The combination of the results of several studies comparing the same two interventions is known as meta-analysis. The concept of meta-analysis and the corresponding methods are well established in medical statistics. However, in the recent years new methods for indirect comparisons have become more and more popular [ , ]. These comprise both the adjusted indirect comparison of two interventions, which have not been compared directly in a head-to-head-trial, and the simultaneous comparison of more than two interventions in a network of interventions.
机译:比较相同两种干预措施的几项研究结果的组合被称为荟萃分析。荟萃分析的概念和相应的方法已在医学统计学中得到很好的确立。但是,近年来,用于间接比较的新方法变得越来越流行[,]。这些措施既包括两种干预措施的调整后间接比较(尚未直接在头对头试验中进行比较),也包括在干预措施网络中同时比较两种以上干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号