首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antibiotics >The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review
【2h】

The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review

机译:不同抗生素方案对细菌耐药性的影响:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and objectives: Infections caused by resistant bacteria are a growing public health problem that is linked to many different causes, among them the antibiotics’ incorrect use plays an important role. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the most dangerous behaviors are the early interruption of antibiotic therapy and the use of molecules without appropriate prescription. The authors conducted a systematic review to assess if antibiotic prescription with different regimens is connected to the onset of bacterial resistance. Methods: The authors performed an electronic and manual literature search on four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) from their inception to 15 June 2019. The date of the last search was 27 November 2019. Any article comparing cultural or genic analysis of resistance in patients that took antibiotics with at least two different regimens was included. No language restrictions were applied. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration’s tool whereas case-control and cohort studies were evaluated through the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: The initial search resulted in a total of 1744 titles. After careful evaluation of all results, only three studies satisfied the outcome of the present review. From the qualitative analysis of data, it emerges that even if antibiotics are administered for a shorter period than the conventional one the species that inhabit the oral cavity can adapt quickly and express genes of antibiotic resistance. Additional evidence from this analysis is that not only does the proportion of resistant bacteria increase in the oral cavity, but also in more distant districts such as the intestine. Conclusions: Despite the great number of studies retrieved by electronic databases only few studies investigated the target of this review. The reason for this evidence is that it is not ethical to investigate and compare different antibiotic regimens, shorter or longer than the appropriate one. This evidence is applicable both to prophylactic administrations and to those aimed at treating infections. Besides this, the WHO affirms that, in the absence of infective complications, the prescription of antibiotic after every type of surgical intervention cannot be admitted and that studies dealing with antibiotic regimens that do not comply with drug’s pharmacodynamics characteristics cannot be ethically admitted. PROSPERO acknowledgement of receipt [149149].
机译:背景与目的:由耐药菌引起的感染是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,与许多不同的原因有关,其中抗生素的不正确使用起着重要的作用。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的说法,最危险的行为是抗生素治疗的早期中断和在没有适当处方的情况下使用分子。作者进行了系统评价,以评估采用不同治疗方案的抗生素处方是否与细菌耐药性的发作有关。方法:作者自成立至2019年6月15日,在四个数据库(Web of Science,Scopus,PubMed和Cochrane对照试验注册)上进行了电子和手动文献检索。最后一次检索的日期为2019年11月27日。这篇文章比较了使用至少两种不同治疗方案的抗生素患者耐药性的文化或基因分析。没有语言限制。使用Cochrane合作工具评估了随机对照试验(RCT)的偏倚风险,而病例对照和队列研究则通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行了评估。结果:初步搜索共找到1744个标题。在仔细评估所有结果之后,只有三项研究满足了本次审查的结果。从数据的定性分析中可以看出,即使抗生素的施用时间比常规施用的时间短,居住在口腔中的物种也可以快速适应并表达抗生素抗性基因。该分析的其他证据是,不仅耐药菌的比例在口腔中增加,而且在更远的地区(如肠道)也增加。结论:尽管通过电子数据库检索到大量研究,但很少有研究调查了该评价的目标。该证据的原因是,研究和比较不同抗生素方案(短于或长于适当方案)是不道德的。该证据既可用于预防性给药,也可用于治疗感染。除此之外,世界卫生组织还确认,在没有感染并发症的情况下,不能接受每种外科手术后的抗生素处方,并且不能从伦理上接受有关不符合药物药效学特征的抗生素治疗方案的研究。 PROSPERO收货确认[149149]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号