首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Critique of the tragic case method in ethics education
【2h】

Critique of the tragic case method in ethics education

机译:对道德教育中悲剧案例方法的批判

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is time for the noon conference. Your job is to impart a career‐changing experience in ethics to a group of students and interns gathered from four different schools with varying curriculums in ethics. They have just finished 1½ h of didactic sessions and lunch. One third of them were on call last night. Your first job is to keep them awake. The authors argue that this “tragic case” approach to ethics education is of limited value because it limits understanding of moral problems to dilemmas; negates the moral agency of the student; encourages solutions that are merely intellectual; and suggests that ethical encounters are a matter for experts. The authors propose an alternative that focuses on three issues: the provider‐patient relationship, the relationships between providers in the everyday world of health work and, the social position of healthcare providers in society. In this approach, teachers are not experts but more like guides on a journey who help students to learn that much of ethical practice comprises living through difficult situations of caring for vulnerable others and who help students to navigate some of these difficulties.
机译:现在是时候召开中午会议了。您的工作是向来自四所不同学校,具有不同道德课程的学生和实习生提供改变职业道德的经验。他们刚刚完成了1.5分小时的讲习班和午餐。昨晚有三分之一的电话待命。您的首要工作是使它们保持清醒状态。作者认为,这种“悲剧案例”道德教育方法的价值有限,因为它将对道德问题的理解限制为两难。否定学生的道德能力;鼓励仅是智力的解决方案;并建议道德接触是专家的事。作者提出了一个针对以下三个问题的替代方案:提供者与患者的关系,卫生工作的日常世界中提供者之间的关系以及医疗保健提供者在社会中的社会地位。在这种方法中,教师不是专家,而是更像一个旅程的指南,他们可以帮助学生了解很多道德实践,包括生活在照料弱势群体的困境中,并帮助学生克服其中的一些困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号