首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biomedical Reports >Second-line triple therapy in failures with vonoprazan-based triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori
【2h】

Second-line triple therapy in failures with vonoprazan-based triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

机译:二线三联疗法以基于冯诺哌赞的三联疗法治疗失败而根除幽门螺杆菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gastric acid inhibition during treatment is important for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan (VPZ), has been demonstrated to achieve high eradication rates; however, the efficacy of second-line treatment in failures of VPZ-based triple therapy has not been well studied. The aim of the current study was to determine the efficacy of VPZ in a first-line regimen for H. pylori eradication, and the efficacy of a second-line regimen using metronidazole (MTZ) in failures with the first-line regimen. Of 580 subjects enrolled in the study, 524 patients completed first-line treatment (275 patients who received VPZ and 249 patients who received LPZ). First-line regimens consisted of a combination of clarithromycin (CAM) 200 or 400 mg twice a day, amoxicillin (AMPC) 750 mg twice a day, and either LPZ 30 mg or VPZ 20 mg twice a day, administered orally for 7 days. CAM and VPZ/LPZ were replaced with metronidazole (MTZ) 250 mg and rabeprazole 10 mg in the second-line regimens. The eradication of H. pylori was assessed by the H. pylori stool antigen test. The overall first-line eradication rate with VPZ was significantly higher than that with LPZ [91.0% (250/275) vs. 84.7% (211/249), respectively, P=0.030]. The dose of CAM (400 vs. 800 mg) did not affect the eradication rate in either the VPZ or LPZ regimens. The overall eradication rates of the second-line regimens with MTZ did not differ significantly between the VPZ-failure and LPZ-failure groups [87.0% (20/23) vs. 87.9% (29/33), respectively, P=0.700]. Therefore, VPZ was significantly more effective than LPZ for first-line treatment. In patients with failure of first-line eradication therapy, successful results of second-line eradication therapy did not differ between the VPZ- and LPZ-failure groups. In conclusion, VPZ-based triple therapy should be recommended for eradication of H. pylori.
机译:治疗期间抑制胃酸对于根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染很重要。新型钾竞争性酸阻滞剂vonoprazan(VPZ)已被证明具有很高的根除率。但是,对基于VPZ的三联疗法失败的二线治疗的疗效尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的目的是确定VPZ在根除幽门螺杆菌的一线方案中的疗效,以及在使用一线方案失败时使用甲硝唑(MTZ)的二线方案的有效性。在研究的580位受试者中,有524位患者完成了一线治疗(275位接受VPZ的患者和249位接受LPZ的患者)。一线治疗方案由每日两次200或400毫克的克拉霉素(CAM),每天两次两次的阿莫西林(AMPC)750毫克和每天两次的LPZ 30毫克或VPZ 20毫克的组合组成,口服7天。在二线方案中,用250毫克甲硝唑(MTZ)和10毫克雷贝拉唑代替CAM和VPZ / LPZ。通过幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原测试评估幽门螺杆菌的根除。 VPZ的总体一线清除率显着高于LPZ [分别为91.0%(250/275)和84.7%(211/249),P = 0.030]。在VPZ或LPZ方案中,CAM的剂量(400和800 mg)均不影响根除率。 VPZ失败组和LPZ失败组之间,MTZ二线方案的总根除率没有显着差异[分别为87.0%(20/23)和87.9%(29/33),P = 0.700] 。因此,对于一线治疗,VPZ明显比LPZ更有效。一线根除治疗失败的患者,二线根除治疗的成功结果在VPZ和LPZ失败组之间没有差异。总之,应建议基于VPZ的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号