首页> 中文期刊> 《世界核心医学期刊文摘:胃肠病学分册》 >奥美拉唑三联疗法与兰索拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌比较

奥美拉唑三联疗法与兰索拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌比较

         

摘要

cqvip:Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithrom ycin is widely accepted for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The choice of PPI for triple therapy in Israel is arbitrary, with no preference for any one PPI exc ept for economic considerations. Direct comparison between omeprazole and lansop razole for efficacy of H. pylori eradication has never been performed in an Isra eli poplulation. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, lansoprazole-based therapy may be a better alternative than omeprazole-based therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of triple therapy regimens with omeprazole (L osec, AstraZeneca; or Omeradex, Dexxon) or lansoprazole (TAP Pharmaceuticals) in eradicating H. pylori infection. The database of the biggest health insurance p rovider in Israel was reviewed for all patients who received 1 week of treatment with omeprazole (n = 1293) or lansoprazole (n = 85) with additional amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori eradication in 2002. All patients underwent th e 13C-urea breath test (13CUBT) for validation of eradication. A negative 13CUB T result was noted in 1026 of the patients treated with omeprazole (79.4%) and 61 treated with lansoprazole (71.8%). On logistic regression analysis, none of the confounding factors (sex, age, indication, chronic use of PPI, eradication p rotocol) were found to contribute to the discrimination between a negative (succ essful eradication) and a positive (failed eradication) 13CUBT. There is no stat istically significant difference between omeprazole and lansoprazole as part of a PPI-based triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号