首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica >No Effect of a Homeopathic Preparation on Neonatal Calf Diarrhoea in a Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
【2h】

No Effect of a Homeopathic Preparation on Neonatal Calf Diarrhoea in a Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:顺势疗法制剂对新生儿小腿腹泻的随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验无影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of a homeopathic treatment of neonatal calf diarrhoea was performed using 44 calves in 12 dairy herds. Calves with spontaneously derived diarrhoea were treated with either the homeopathic remedy Podophyllum (D30) (n = 24) or a placebo (n = 20). No clinically or statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was demonstrated. Calves treated with Podophyllum had an average of 3.1 days of diarrhoea compared with 2.9 days for the placebo group. Depression, inappetence and fever were presented equally in the 2 groups. These results support the widely held opinion that scientific proof for the efficacy of veterinary homeopathy is lacking. In the European Union this implies a considerable risk for animal welfare, since in some countries priority is given to homeopathic treatments in organic farming.
机译:使用44头小牛对12个奶牛群进行了顺势疗法治疗新生儿小牛腹泻的双盲,安慰剂对照临床试验。自发性腹泻的小牛用顺势疗法鬼臼(D30)(n = 24)或安慰剂(n = 20)治疗。两组之间在临床或统计学上均无明显差异。用鬼臼治疗的小牛平均腹泻为3.1天,而安慰剂组为2.9天。两组均出现抑郁,食欲不振和发烧。这些结果支持了广泛的观点,即缺乏对动物顺势疗法功效的科学证明。在欧洲联盟中,这意味着很大的动物福利风险,因为在某些国家中,有机耕种中的顺势疗法被优先考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号