首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >Frontal Sled Tests Comparing Rear and Forward Facing Child Restraints with 1–3 Year Old Dummies
【2h】

Frontal Sled Tests Comparing Rear and Forward Facing Child Restraints with 1–3 Year Old Dummies

机译:正面雪橇测试将面向后和向前的儿童约束与1至3岁的假人进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although most countries recommend transitioning children from rear facing (RF) to forward facing (FF) child restraints at one year of age, Swedish data suggests that RF restraints are more effective. The objective of this study was to compare RF and FF orientations in frontal sled tests. Four dummies (CRABI 12mo, Q1.5, Hybrid III 3yr, and Q3) were used to represent children from 1 to 3 years of age. Restraint systems tested included both 1) LATCH and 2) rigid ISOFIX with support leg designs. Rear facing restraints with support legs provided the best results for all injury measures, while RF restraints in general provided the lowest chest displacements and neck loads.
机译:尽管大多数国家/地区建议将儿童约束装置从一岁时的后向约束(RF)转换为朝前约束(FF),但是瑞典的数据表明,RF约束更为有效。这项研究的目的是比较正面雪橇测试中的RF和FF方向。四个假人(CRABI 12mo,Q1.5,Hybrid III 3yr和Q3)用于代表1至3岁的儿童。测试的约束系统包括1)闩锁和2)带有支撑腿设计的刚性ISOFIX。带支撑腿的后向约束装置可为所有伤害措施提供最佳效果,而射频约束装置通常可提供最低的胸部移位和颈部负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号