首页> 外文会议>2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop >Is it safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one while head-on collision?
【24h】

Is it safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one while head-on collision?

机译:在正面碰撞时将三岁大的孩子在向前碰撞的儿童约束系统中或在朝后碰撞的儿童约束系统中运输,是否更安全?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Currently, it remains a contentious issue whether it is safer to transport children rear-facing or forward-facing - in Sweden, children are transported rear facing up to the age of 4 years and in Australia only up to 6 months. The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one. In the study, a child dummy model of the Q-series representing a 3-year-old child was considered. Biomechanical injury criteria connected with the most important body regions and its critical value were defined. The frontal impact with several impact speeds were analyzed. For all tested configurations a higher risk of serious injury to head and neck was indicated for forward-facing child seat. On this basis, it could be concluded that it is safer to transport a child in the rear-facing child seat.
机译:当前,向后运输还是向后运输儿童是否更安全仍是一个有争议的问题-在瑞典,儿童被运输为面向后方的年龄最大为4岁,而澳大利亚仅为6个月。这项研究的目的是调查在朝前的儿童约束系统或朝后的儿童约束系统中运输三岁大的孩子是否更安全。在研究中,考虑了代表3岁孩子的Q系列儿童假人模型。定义了与最重要的身体部位有关的生物力学损伤标准及其临界值。分析了具有几种撞击速度的正面撞击。对于所有经过测试的配置,朝前的儿童座椅均表示头部和颈部受到严重伤害的风险更高。在此基础上,可以得出结论,将儿童放在面向后的儿童座椅中更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号