首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition >Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth anddevelopment of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants:a matched group comparison
【2h】

Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth anddevelopment of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants:a matched group comparison

机译:妊娠和出生体重对生长发育和生长的影响胎龄儿超低体重的发展:匹配的组比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS—To investigate the effects of small for gestational age (SGA) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants on growth and development until the fifth year of life.
METHODS—VLBW (< 1500 g) infants, selected from a prospective study, were classified as SGA (n = 115) on the basis of birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age and were compared with two groups of appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants matched according to birth weight (AGA-BW; n = 115) or gestation at birth (AGA-GA; n = 115). Prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal risk factors were recorded, and duration and intensity of treatment were computed from daily assessments. Body weight, length, and head circumference were measured at birth, five and 20 months (corrected for prematurity), and at 56 months. General development was assessed at five and 20 months with the Griffiths scale of babies abilities, and cognitive development at 56 months with the Columbia mental maturity scales, a vocabulary (AWST) and language comprehension test (LSVTA).
RESULTS—Significant group differences were found in complications (pregnancy, birth, and neonatal), parity, and multiple birth rate. The AGA-GA group showed most satisfactory growth up to 56 months, with both the AGA-BW and SGA groups lagging behind. The AGA-GA group also scored significantly more highly on all developmental and cognitive tests than the other groups. Developmental test results weresimilar for the SGA and AGA-BW groups at five and 20 months, but AGA-BWinfants (lowest gestation) had lower scores on performance intelligencequotient and language comprehension at 56 months than the SGA group.When prenatal and neonatal complications, parity, and multiple birthwere accounted for, group differences in growth remained, butdifferences in cognitive outcome disappeared after five months.
CONCLUSIONS—Beingunderweight and with a short gestation (SGA and VLBW) leads to poorweight gain and head growth in infancy but does not result in poorergrowth than in infants of the same birth weight but shorter gestation(AGA-BW) in the long term. SGA is related to early developmental delayand later language problems; however, neonatal complications may have alarger detrimental effect on long term cognitive development of VLBWinfants than whether they are born SGA or AGA.

机译:目的—研究超低体重婴儿(VLBW)的小胎龄(SGA)对直至五岁的生长和发育的影响。
方法-VLBW(<1500 g)婴儿,选自前瞻性研究根据出生体重低于胎龄的第10个百分位数归类为SGA(n = 115),并与根据出生体重匹配的两组适合胎龄(AGA)的婴儿进行了比较(AGA-BW; n = 115)或出生时的妊娠(AGA-GA; n = 115)。记录产前,围产期和产后的危险因素,并根据每日评估计算出治疗的持续时间和强度。在出生时,5和20个月(早产校正)和56个月时测量体重,身长和头围。用婴儿能力的格里菲斯量表评估了一般发育,分别在5和20个月时进行了评估,并使用了哥伦比亚智力成熟量表,词汇量(AWST)和语言理解测试(LSVTA)在了56个月时评估了认知发育。
结果—显着在并发症(妊娠,出生和新生儿),胎次和多胎出生率方面发现组差异。 AGA-GA组在56个月内表现出最令人满意的增长,而AGA-BW和SGA组均落后。 AGA-GA组在所有发育和认知测试中的得分也明显高于其他组。发育测试结果为对于SGA和AGA-BW组,在五个月和二十个月时,情况相似,但是AGA-BW婴儿(最低妊娠)的表现智力得分较低比SGA组在56个月时的商数和语言理解能力。当产前和新生儿并发症,胎次和多胎被考虑,增长的群体差异仍然存在,但是五个月后,认知结局的差异消失了。
结论—存在体重不足且妊娠期短(SGA和VLBW)会导致体重下降体重增加和婴儿期头部增长,但不会导致婴儿体重下降出生体重相同但妊娠时间较短的婴儿的生长情况(AGA-BW)长期来看。 SGA与早期发育延迟有关以及后来的语言问题;但是,新生儿并发症可能会对VLBW长期认知发展的较大不利影响婴儿,而不是出生于SGA或AGA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号