首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy
【2h】

Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy

机译:科学素养技能测试的使用表明基本素养是科学素养的重要贡献者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

College science courses aim to teach students both disciplinary knowledge and scientific literacy skills. Several instruments have been developed to assess students’ scientific literacy skills, but few studies have reported how demographic differences may play a role. The goal of this study was to determine whether demographic factors differentially impact students’ scientific literacy skills. We assessed more than 700 students using the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS), a validated instrument developed to assess scientific literacy in college science courses. Interestingly, we found that Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) reading score was the strongest predictor of TOSLS performance, suggesting that fundamental literacy (reading comprehension) is a critical component of scientific literacy skills. Additionally, we found significant differences in raw scientific literacy skills on the basis of ethnicity (underrepresented minority [URM] vs. non-URM), major (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [STEM] vs. non-STEM), year of college (e.g., senior vs. freshman), grade point average (GPA), and SAT math scores. However, when using multivariate regression models, we found no difference based on ethnicity. These data suggest that students’ aptitude and level of training (based on GPA, SAT scores, STEM or non–STEM major, and year of college) are significantly correlated with scientific literacy skills and thus could be used as predictors for student success in courses that assess scientific literacy skills.
机译:大学科学课程旨在教授学生学科知识和科学素养技能。已经开发了多种工具来评估学生的科学素养技能,但很少有研究报告人口差异如何发挥作用。这项研究的目的是确定人口统计学因素是否会对学生的科学素养技能产生差异。我们使用科学素养测试(TOSLS)对700多名学生进行了评估,这是一种经过验证的工具,旨在评估大学科学课程中的科学素养。有趣的是,我们发现学业能力测验(SAT)的阅读分数是TOSLS成绩的最强预测指标,表明基本读写能力(阅读理解)是科学读写能力的关键组成部分。此外,我们发现,根据种族(未充分代表的少数族裔[URM]与非URM的人),专业(科学,技术,工程和数学[STEM]与非STEM的人),年份的不同,原始科学素养技能存在显着差异大学(例如,高年级与新生),平均成绩(GPA)和SAT数学分数。但是,当使用多元回归模型时,我们没有发现基于种族的差异。这些数据表明,学生的才能和培训水平(基于GPA,SAT分数,STEM或非STEM专业以及大学年份)与科学素养技能显着相关,因此可以用作预测学生在课程中取得成功的依据评估科学素养技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号