首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology >Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients
【2h】

Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients

机译:腹腔镜与开放手术治疗老年大肠癌的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To verify the safety and validity of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of a systematic search of studies on an electronic database. Studies that compared laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) in elderly colorectal cancer patients with open colectomy (OC) were retrieved, and their short and long-term outcomes compared. Elderly people were defined as 65 years old or more. Inclusion criteria were set at: Resection of colorectal cancer, comparison between laparoscopic and OC and no significant difference in backgrounds between groups.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified for analysis. LAC was performed on 1436 patients, and OC performed on 1810 patients. In analyses of short-term outcomes, operation time for LAC was longer than for OC (mean difference = 34.4162, 95%CI: 17.8473-50.9851, P < 0.0001). The following clinical parameters were lower in LAC than in OC: Amount of estimated blood loss (mean difference = -93.3738, 95%CI: -132.3437 to -54.4039, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity (OR = 0.5427, 95%CI: 0.4425-0.6655, P < 0.0001), incisional surgical site infection (OR = 0.6262, 95%CI: 0.4310-0.9097, P = 0.0140), bowel obstruction and ileus (OR = 0.6248, 95%CI: 0.4519-0.8638, P = 0.0044) and cardiovascular complications (OR = 0.4767, 95%CI: 0.2805-0.8101, P = 0.0062). In analyses of long-term outcomes (median follow-up period: 36.4 mo in LAC, 34.3 mo in OC), there was no significant difference in overall survival (mean difference = 0.8321, 95%CI: 0.5331-1.2990, P = 0.4187) and disease specific survival (mean difference = 1.0254, 95%CI: 0.6707-1.5675, P = 0.9209). There was also no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes (mean difference = -0.1360, 95%CI: -4.0553-3.7833, P = 0.9458).CONCLUSION: LAC in elderly colorectal cancer patients had benefits in short-term outcomes compared with OC except operation time. The long-term outcomes and oncological clearance of LAC were similar to that of OC. These results support the assertion that LAC is an effective procedure for elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
机译:目的:为了验证腹腔镜手术治疗老年大肠癌的安全性和有效性。方法:对在电子数据库中进行系统研究的荟萃分析。检索比较腹腔镜结肠切除术(LAC)在老年结直肠癌患者中进行开​​放结肠切除术(OC)的研究,并比较其短期和长期结局。老年人被定义为65岁或以上。纳入标准设定为:结直肠癌切除,腹腔镜和OC的比较,各组之间背景无显着差异。结果:确定了15项研究进行分析。对1436例患者进行了LAC,对1810例患者进行了OC。在短期结果分析中,LAC的手术时间长于OC(平均差异= 34.4162,95%CI:17.8473-50.9851,P <0.0001)。 LAC的以下临床参数低于OC:估计失血量(平均差异= -93.3738,95%CI:-132.3437至-54.4039,P <0.0001),总体发病率(OR = 0.5427,95%CI: 0.4425-0.6655,P <0.0001),切口手术部位感染(OR = 0.6262,95%CI:0.4310-0.9097,P = 0.0140),肠梗阻和肠梗阻(OR = 0.6248,95%CI:0.4519-0.8638,P = 0.0044)和心血管并发症(OR = 0.4767,95%CI:0.2805-0.8101,P = 0.0062)。在长期结局分析(中位随访期:LAC为36.4 mo,OC为34.3 mo)中,总生存期无显着差异(平均差异= 0.8321,95%CI:0.5331-1.2990,P = 0.4187) )和疾病特异性存活率(平均差异= 1.0254,95%CI:0.6707-1.5675,P = 0.9209)。淋巴结清扫的数目也没有显着差异(平均差异= -0.1360,95%CI:-4.0553-3.7833,P = 0.9458)。结论:老年结肠直肠癌患者的LAC与短期结局相比具有优势使用OC,但操作时间除外。 LAC的长期结局和肿瘤清除率与OC相似。这些结果支持这样的主张,即LAC对老年结直肠癌患者是一种有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号