首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Consumer Attitude Toward the Environmental Sustainability of Grain-Free Pet Foods
【2h】

Consumer Attitude Toward the Environmental Sustainability of Grain-Free Pet Foods

机译:消费者对无谷物宠物食品环境可持续性的态度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated consumer knowledge and attitude toward environmental sustainability, grain-free diets (GFDs), and the influence of on-site environmental sustainability education on pet owner diet choices. A two-part questionnaire was designed, bracketing an educational brochure on environmental sustainability and GFDs. The study consisted of an informational brochure and two questionnaire sections, Q1 and Q2. Preliminary information regarding current diets, diet choice(s), views of environmental sustainability, the definition of GFDs, and the likelihood of feeding GFDs were gathered via Q1. Participants then read a factual brochure regarding pet food trends and environmental sustainability. After reading the brochure, participants completed Q2. Pet ownership of the survey population indicated 12/78 cared exclusively for at least one cat, 48/78 cared exclusively for at least one dog, and 18 cared exclusively for at least one dog and one cat. The majority (70/78) of survey responders fed a dry commercial product, 25/78 fed a canned commercial product, and 1/78 fed a commercial raw product. Prior to reading the brochure, 44.9% of participants were able to partially identify a GFD, 47.4% partially defined environmental sustainability, and 19.2% reported feeding a GFD. After reading the brochure, 67.6% of participants were able to identify a more environmentally sustainable diet vs. 55.9% prior to reading the brochure. A paired T-test demonstrated that after reading the brochure, people were significantly less likely to feed a GFD (p < 0.001). When participants already feeding a GFD were isolated, they demonstrated a higher likelihood to feed a GFD both before and after reading the pamphlet than the remaining population; however, the likelihood decreased from 8.4 ± 2.7 to 7.8 ± 2.7. The informational brochure was effective; participants were less likely to feed a GFD after reading the brochure. Although participants considered environmental sustainability important, factors independent of environmental sustainability influenced the likelihood of diet change. Participants already feeding a GFD also ranked environmental sustainability highly but were less likely to consider changing their pet's diet. These preliminary findings identify a need for public education regarding pet food choices that can have environmental consequences.
机译:这项研究调查了消费者对环境可持续性,无谷物饮食(GFD)的知识和态度,以及现场环境可持续性教育对宠物主人饮食选择的影响。设计了一个分为两部分的问卷,将有关环境可持续性和GFD的教育手册放在括号内。这项研究包括一本信息手册和两个问卷调查部分,分别为Q1和Q2。通过第一季度收集了有关当前饮食,饮食选择,环境可持续性观点,GFD的定义以及饲喂GFD的可能性的初步信息。然后,参与者阅读有关宠物食品趋势和环境可持续性的事实手册。阅读手册后,参与者完成了第二季度。接受调查的人群的宠物拥有率表明,仅12/78只照顾至少一只猫,48/78只照顾至少一只狗,18岁只照顾至少一只狗和一只猫。大部分(70/78)的调查受访者喂食了干燥的商业产品,25/78喂食了罐装商业产品,1/78喂了商业原料。在阅读手册之前,有44.9%的参与者能够部分识别GFD,47.4%的参与者部分定义了环境可持续性,还有19.2%的参与者表示喂养了GFD。阅读手册后,与阅读手册之前的55.9%的参与者相比,有67.6%的参与者能够确定对环境更可持续的饮食。配对的T检验表明,阅读手册后,人们喂食GFD的可能性大大降低(p <0.001)。当已经喂食GFD的参与者被隔离时,他们证明在阅读小册子之前和之后喂食GFD的可能性要比其余人群高。但是,可能性从8.4±2.7降低到7.8±2.7。信息手册是有效的;参与者在阅读手册后不太可能喂GFD。尽管参与者认为环境可持续性很重要,但独立于环境可持续性的因素影响了饮食改变的可能性。已经喂食GFD的参与者也对环境可持续性给予了高度评价,但不太可能考虑改变宠物的饮食。这些初步发现确定需要对可能会对环境造成影响的宠物食品进行公众教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号