首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have fair health?
【2h】

Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have fair health?

机译:跨国比较分析中的语义偏差:拥有公平的健康是好是坏?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
机译:学龄儿童的健康行为是一项跨国研究,收集了43个国家/地区青少年社会和健康指标的数据。该研究通过使用通用协议提供了有关健康行为和健康结果的可比数据,这是该研究始于1983年的骨干。近年来,该研究中的研究人员注意到在广泛使用的可比性上存在可疑的可比性。关于自我评估健康的项目。 “您想说您的健康状况是……吗?”项目的四个回答类别之一表现出特别的差异,因为回答类别“一般”从拉脱维亚和摩尔多瓦的20%到保加利亚和马其顿的3-4%。反向翻译的定性小调查显示,回答类别“公平”在25个国家中为负斜率,在10个国家中为正斜率,在9个国家中被视为中性。这一发现表明,在国际研究中可能存在影响可比性的语义问题,因为相同的原始单词(英语原文)在不同国家和文化中的解释不同。该论文测试并讨论了对此的一些可能解释,但是,如果使用具有四个响应类别的自评健康项目,只有留待以后的研究对国际比较持谨慎态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号