...
首页> 外文期刊>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
【24h】

Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?

机译:跨国比较分析中的语义偏见:“公平”健康是好还是坏?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item "Would you say your health is….?" showed particular variation, as the response category "Fair" varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3-4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category "Fair" had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
机译:学龄儿童中的健康行为是一项跨国学习,在43个国家的青少年社会和健康指标收集数据。该研究提供了通过使用常用协议的健康行为和健康结果的可比数据,该议定书一直是研究的背骨,这是1983年开始的。近年来,研究中的研究人员已经注意到了广泛使用的可疑可比性自我评价的健康项目。这个项目的四个响应类别之一“你会说你的健康是......表现出特殊的变化,因为响应类别“公平”在拉脱维亚和摩尔多瓦的20%在保加利亚和马其顿的3-4%之间变化。对后翻的定性迷你调查显示,响应类别“公平”在25个国家的负面倾斜,在10个国家是一个积极的倾向,被认为是9个国家的中立。这一发现表明,由于各国和文化中的相同原始词(英语原始),有可能被称为影响国际研究可比性的语义问题。该论文测试并讨论了一些可能的解释,但是,如果使用具有四个响应类别的自评卫生项目,则仅离开未来的研究以持有谨慎的国际比较方法。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号