首页> 外文学位 >Orientalism in American cinema: Providing an historical and geographical context for post-colonial theory.
【24h】

Orientalism in American cinema: Providing an historical and geographical context for post-colonial theory.

机译:美国电影中的东方主义:为后殖民理论提供历史和地理背景。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Of the many criticisms leveled at Edward Said's seminal work, Orientalism (1978), and those of post-colonial theorists following in his wake, from an historian's perspective the most significant is that his argument is utterly lacking in historical context. In fact, post-colonial theorists do tend to mistrust the validity of history and often are suspicious of its complicity in the enterprise of western empires. Despite Said's undeniable ahistoricism, however, most historians agree that the basic tenants of his argument have merit. What is lacking, then, is an examination of orientalism not as an indictment, with all manner of evidence pulled seemingly at random from a jumble of historic periods and geographic locations, but as an historical trend, a bi-product -- and often abettor -- of empire-building, artistic [mis]representation and othering of the unknown, which manifests itself in a variety of ways in different periods and settings. Analyzing the nature of orientalism in a specific western form of representation set against the historical context with regard to a certain geographic location, and how it evolves in form as the historical/political backdrop advances, will ground the endeavor of post-colonial theory firmly within the framework of historical inquiry. This will test the validity of Said's thesis when the issues of his historicism and his references to portrayals of various and incongruous locales are corrected. I attempt to do this here by examining orientalism in American films set in Iraq, Egypt and Jerusalem, from the silent era to the present day, and tracing the unique form it takes and the evolution it undergoes as a result of American political/military interaction with and cultural awareness of each of these locations, respectively.
机译:从史学家的角度来看,爱德华·赛义德(Edward Said)的开创性著作《东方主义》(Orientalism,1978)和后来的后殖民理论家提出的许多批评中,从历史学家的角度来看,最重要的是,他的论点在历史语境中完全缺乏。实际上,后殖民理论家的确倾向于不相信历史的正确性,并且常常怀疑其在西方帝国企业中的同谋。尽管赛义德拥有不可否认的历史主义,但是,大多数历史学家都认为他论点的基本承租人是有功的。因此,缺少的是对东方主义的审查,而不是作为一种起诉,所有的证据似乎都是从历史时期和地理位置的混乱中随机抽取的,而是作为一种历史趋势,是双重产物-而且常常是教bet主义者-帝国的建立,艺术的[mis]表征和未知的其他事物,在不同的时期和环境中以各种方式表现出来。在特定地理位置的历史背景下,以特定的西方表现形式来分析东方主义的本质,以及随着历史/政治背景的发展,东方主义的形式如何演变,将为后殖民理论的发展奠定坚实的基础。历史探究的框架。当赛义德的历史学问题和他对各种不协调的地区的描述的引用得到纠正时,这将检验赛义德论文的有效性。我试图通过研究在无声时代到今天在伊拉克,埃及和耶路撒冷拍摄的美国电影中的东方主义,并追寻它在美国政治/军事互动中所采取的独特形式以及经历的演变,来做到这一点分别对每个地点都具有文化意识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scurry, Samuel Thadeus.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Cinema.;Middle Eastern Studies.;History Middle Eastern.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 104 p.
  • 总页数 104
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号