首页> 外文学位 >A Strategy for Matching Noise Magnitude and Texture Across CT Scanners of Different Makes and Models.
【24h】

A Strategy for Matching Noise Magnitude and Texture Across CT Scanners of Different Makes and Models.

机译:一种跨不同品牌和型号的CT扫描仪匹配噪声大小和纹理的策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: The fleet of x-ray computed tomography systems used by large medical institutions is often comprised of scanners from various manufacturers. An inhomogeneous fleet of scanners could lead to inconsistent image quality due to the different features and technologies implemented by each manufacturer. Specifically, image noise could be highly variable across scanners from different manufacturers. To partly address this problem, we have performed two studies to characterize noise magnitude and texture on two scanners: one from GE Healthcare and one from Siemens Healthcare. The purpose of the first study was to evaluate how noise magnitude changes as a function of image quality indicators (e.g., "noise index" and "quality reference mAs") when automatic tube current modulation is used. The purpose of the second study was to compare and match reconstruction kernels from each vendor with respect to noise texture.;Methods: The first study was performed by imaging anthropomorphic phantoms on each scanner using a clinical range of scan settings and image quality indicator values. Noise magnitude was measured at various anatomical locations using an image subtraction technique. Noise was then modeled as a function of image quality indicators and other scan parameters that were found to significantly affect the noise-image quality indicator relationship.;The second study was performed by imaging the American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom with a comparable acquisition protocol on each scanner. Images were reconstructed using filtered backprojection and a wide selection of reconstruction kernels. We then estimated the noise power spectrum (NPS) of each image set and performed a systematic kernel-by-kernel comparison of spectra using the peak frequency difference (PFD) and the root mean square error (RMSE) as metrics of similarity. Kernels that minimized the PFD and RMSE were paired.;Results: From the fist study, on the GE scanner, noise magnitude increased linearly with noise index. The slope of that line was affected by changing the anatomy of interest, kVp, reconstruction algorithm, and convolution kernel. The noise-noise index relationship was independent of phantom size, slice thickness, pitch, field of view, and beam width. On the Siemens scanner, noise magnitude decreased non-linearly with increasing quality reference effective mAs, slice thickness, and peak tube voltage. The noise-quality reference effective mAs relationship also depended on anatomy of interest, phantom size, age selection, and reconstruction algorithm but was independent of pitch, field of view, and detector configuration.;From the second study, the RMSE between the NPS of GE and Siemens kernels varied from 0.02 to 0.74 mm. The GE kernels "Soft", "Standard", "Chest", and "Lung" closely matched the Siemens kernels "B35f", "B43f", "B46f", and "B80f" (RMSE<0.07 mm, PFD<0.02 mm-1). The GE "Bone", "Bone+", and "Edge" kernels all matched most closely to Siemens "B75f" kernel but with sizeable RMSE and PFD values up to 0.62 mm and 0.5 mm-1 respectively. These sizeable RMSE and PFD values corresponded to visually perceivable differences in the noise texture of the images.;Conclusions: From the first study, we established how noise changes with changing image quality indicators across a clinically relevant range of imaging parameters. This will allow us target equal noise levels across manufacturers. From the second study, we concluded that it is possible to use the NPS to quantitatively compare noise texture across CT systems. We found that many commonly used GE and Siemens kernels have similar texture. The degree to which similar texture across scanners could be achieved varies and is limited by the kernels available on each scanner. This result will aid in choosing appropriate corresponding kernels for each scanner when writing protocols. Taken together, the results from these two studies will allow us to write protocols that result in images with more consistent noise properties.
机译:目的:大型医疗机构使用的X射线计算机断层摄影系统通常由来自不同制造商的扫描仪组成。由于每个制造商实施的功能和技术不同,扫描仪队数不均匀可能导致图像质量不一致。具体来说,图像噪声在不同制造商的扫描仪之间可能会高度变化。为了部分解决此问题,我们进行了两项研究来表征两种扫描仪上的噪声大小和纹理:一种来自GE Healthcare,另一种来自Siemens Healthcare。第一项研究的目的是评估使用自动电子管电流调制时噪声幅度如何随图像质量指标(例如“噪声指数”和“质量参考mAs”)而变化。第二项研究的目的是比较和匹配每个供应商在噪声纹理方面的重建内核。方法:第一项研究是通过使用临床范围的扫描设置和图像质量指标值对每台扫描仪上的拟人化幻像进行成像来进行的。使用图像减法技术在各个解剖位置测量了噪声大小。然后将噪声建模为图像质量指标和其他扫描参数的函数,这些参数被发现会显着影响噪声与图像质量指标的关系。;第二项研究是通过使用可比较的采集协议对美国放射学院CT认证体模进行成像在每个扫描仪上。使用滤波后的反投影和多种选择的重建内核来重建图像。然后,我们估计每个图像集的噪声功率谱(NPS),并使用峰频差(PFD)和均方根误差(RMSE)作为相似性指标,对光谱进行系统的逐个内核比较。结果:从第一项研究来看,在GE扫描仪上,噪声幅度随噪声指数线性增加。该线的斜率受感兴趣的解剖结构,kVp,重建算法和卷积核的影响。噪声指数指标的关系与模型尺寸,切片厚度,间距,视场和光束宽度无关。在西门子扫描仪上,噪声幅度随质量基准有效mAs,切片厚度和峰值管电压的增加而非线性降低。噪声质量参考有效mAs关系还取决于感兴趣的解剖结构,体模大小,年龄选择和重建算法,但与音高,视野和检测器配置无关。;从第二项研究来看,NPS的NPS之间的RMSE GE和西门子内核的尺寸从0.02到0.74 mm不等。 GE内核“ Soft”,“ Standard”,“ Chest”和“ Lung”与西门子内核“ B35f”,“ B43f”,“ B46f”和“ B80f”紧密匹配(RMSE <0.07 mm,PFD <0.02 mm -1)。 GE“ Bone”,“ Bone +”和“ Edge”内核与西门子“ B75f”内核的匹配程度最高,但其RMSE和PFD值分别高达0.62 mm和0.5 mm-1。这些相当大的RMSE和PFD值对应于图像噪声纹理的视觉可察觉差异。结论:从第一项研究中,我们确定了在临床相关成像参数范围内,噪声如何随着图像质量指标的变化而变化。这将使我们能够在各个制造商之间达到相同的噪声水平。从第二项研究中,我们得出结论,可以使用NPS定量比较整个CT系统的噪声纹理。我们发现许多常用的GE和Siemens内核具有相似的纹理。可以在整个扫描仪上实现相似纹理的程度各不相同,并受每个扫描仪上可用内核的限制。此结果将有助于在编写协议时为每个扫描程序选择适当的相应内核。两者合计,这两项研究的结果将使我们能够编写出能够使图像具有更一致的噪声特性的协议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Solomon, Justin Bennion.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Medical imaging.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 73 p.
  • 总页数 73
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号