【24h】

The reformed analytical Kano model

机译:改革后的分析卡诺模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The traditional Kano's model is widely used by industries and researchers, but some controversy still exists surrounding the classification of quality attributes. Furthermore, the resultant Kano category is not a true quantitative measure. Although the analytical Kano model is proposed to manage these issues, the model still has room for improvements regarding the complex process in practical applications. Additionally, the scoring scheme of the analytical Kano model is against the basic assumption of prospect theory. Consequently, this study attempts to reform the analytical Kano model, and then accurately suggests the priority of improvements. First, this study revises the indicators of the vertical axis and the horizontal axis of the analytical Kano model. Second, regression analysis with dummy variables is used to estimate the impact of attribute performance on overall satisfaction and then to determine the categories of quality attributes. Then, this study considers the results of the categorizing the quality attributes, the attribute performance, and the asymmetric impact of attribute performance on overall satisfaction before suggesting definite priorities for improvement. Finally, the reformed analytical Kano model is illustrated in a case study.
机译:传统的卡诺模型已被行业和研究人员广泛使用,但是围绕质量属性的分类仍然存在一些争议。此外,得出的卡诺类别不是真正的量化指标。尽管提出了分析性Kano模型来解决这些问题,但是该模型在实际应用中仍具有改进复杂过程的空间。此外,分析性Kano模型的评分方案与预期理论的基本假设背道而驰。因此,本研究试图改革分析性卡诺模型,然后准确地提出改进的优先次序。首先,本研究修改了解析Kano模型的垂直轴和水平轴的指标。其次,使用带有虚拟变量的回归分析来估计属性性能对整体满意度的影响,然后确定质量属性的类别。然后,本研究考虑了质量属性,属性绩效以及属性绩效对整体满意度的不对称影响进行分类的结果,然后提出了确定的改进重点。最后,在案例研究中说明了改革后的分析性Kano模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号