首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Industrial and Business Management >Joining Methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Kano Model and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to Improve the Tractor’s Seat Design for Tractor Drivers in Bangladesh
【24h】

Joining Methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Kano Model and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to Improve the Tractor’s Seat Design for Tractor Drivers in Bangladesh

机译:加入分析层次过程(AHP),KANO模型和质量函数部署(QFD),以改善孟加拉国拖拉机司机拖拉机座椅设计

获取原文
           

摘要

Nowadays, many product development projects fail as for not meeting customer’s expectations up to the mark as product development process is conducted very unsystematically and results in waste of resources. Customer requirement and satisfaction measurement is a major challenge which can be achieved through various methods. This paper presents joining methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Kano Model and Quality Function Deployment to improve the Tractor’s Seat design for tractor driver’s in Bangladesh in terms of ergonomic and user’s needs. A survey was done to 50 Tractor drivers to identify problems of the current seat. By analyzing the data identified the customer requirements and ranked it using AHP. With that Kano questionnaires were developed and answered by 50 tractor drivers. After that, with the integration of Kano model, QFD process was carried out to determine the customer requirement weight and the technical requirement weight to develop a modified design. At the end of the study, it was found out that both methods were able to prioritize the modification elements to be implemented into the new ergonomically designed tractor seat. Still there are some limitations. The analysis was performed based on 50 tractor drivers. For more correct results, more than 50 drivers could be taken into account.
机译:如今,许多产品开发项目由于不满足客户对标志而不满足客户的期望,因为产品开发过程非常不系统地进行,并导致资源浪费。客户要求和满意度测量是通过各种方法实现的主要挑战。本文提出了分析层次过程(AHP),KANO模型和质量函数部署的加入方法,以改善孟加拉国拖拉机司机座椅设计,符合人体工程学和用户的需求。调查完成了50个拖拉机司机,以识别当前座位的问题。通过分析数据确定了客户要求,并使用AHP排名。通过50辆拖拉机司机开发并回答了Kano问卷。之后,随着KANO模型的集成,进行了QFD过程以确定客户需求重量和技术要求重量以开发改进的设计。在研究结束时,发现两种方法都能够优先考虑将改性元件实施到新的符合人体工程学设计的拖拉机座椅中。还有一些局限性。基于50辆拖拉机驱动器进行分析。对于更正确的结果,可以考虑超过50个驱动程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号