首页> 外文会议>Polish Control Conference >A Comparison of LQR and MPC Control Algorithms of an Inverted Pendulum
【24h】

A Comparison of LQR and MPC Control Algorithms of an Inverted Pendulum

机译:LQR和MPC控制算法的比较倒摆

获取原文

摘要

The subject of this paper is a comparison of two control strategies of an inverted pendulum on a cart. The first one is a linear-quadratic regulator (LQR), while the second is a state space model predictive controller (SSMPC). The study was performed on the simulation model of an inverted pendulum, determined on the basis of the actual physical parameters collected from the laboratory stand AMIRA LIP100. It has been shown that the LQR algorithm works better for fixed-value control and disturbance rejection, while the SSMPC controller is more suitable for the trajectory tracking task. Furthermore, the system with SSMPC controller has smoother changes in the control signal, that can be beneficial for an actuator, while LQR controller may generate adverse, rapid changes in the control signal.
机译:本文的主题是在推车上的两种控制策略的比较。第一个是线性二次调节器(LQR),而第二个是状态空间模型预测控制器(SSMPC)。该研究是对倒摆的模拟模型进行的,基于从实验室支架Amira Lip100收集的实际物理参数确定。已经表明,LQR算法适用于固定值控制和干扰抑制,而SSMPC控制器更适合于轨迹跟踪任务。此外,具有SSMPC控制器的系统在控制信号中具有更平滑的变化,这对于致动器可以是有益的,而LQR控制器可能产生不利,控制信号的快速变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号