首页> 外文会议>International conference on the aerodynamics of heavy vehicles III: Trucks, buses and trains >In Depth Cd/Fuel Economy Study Comparing SAE Type Ⅱ Results with Scale Model Rolling Road and Non-rolling Road Wind Tunnel Results
【24h】

In Depth Cd/Fuel Economy Study Comparing SAE Type Ⅱ Results with Scale Model Rolling Road and Non-rolling Road Wind Tunnel Results

机译:在深度CD /燃料经济性研究中,SAEⅡ型结果与规模模型滚动路和非滚动道风隧道效果

获取原文

摘要

The trucking industry is moving into a new era of development brought on by governmental concerns over energy independence as well as the realities of increasing fuel costs. This has renewed interest in optimizing the aerodynamics of Class 8 tractor-trailer trucks. However, many of the large aerodynamic gains have already been developed, for example trailer skirts and boat tails that give fuel economy improvements of approximately 5 %. Research continues in order to better understand the aerodynamics of these vehicles and further improve their efficiency. Scale model rolling road testing has been around for several decades. In fact, the earliest rolling road wind tunnel test of a Class-8 truck that the authors are aware of occurred in the late 1980s. In order to define the performance of a heavy duty truck, it has been well established that the use of wind averaged drag coefficients are required. To achieve wind averaged drag coefficients, it is necessary to measure data with a model in yaw for either a static floor or rolling road tunnel. The authors previously published results comparing a generic truck model tested using both a moving ground plane and a static ground plane. This paper builds on the work using a more detailed and modern truck model. The improvements in aerodynamic drag by fitting trailer skirts are discussed. These drag reductions are converted into fuel efficiency improvements and are compared to SAE type Ⅱ testing. The reader will be able to appreciate the difficulty associated with attempting to correlate wind tunnel results to SAE Type Ⅱ results. Some of the issues related to scale model rolling road testing such as Reynolds number dependency and yaw over a rolling road will be explored. Due to the size and nature of heavy duty trucks, cross winds must be taken into account. In addition to track or on-road testing, static tunnels have been the primary experimental tool for developing heavy duty trucks. Using the static floor tunnel method, heavy duty truck models have fixed (non-rotating tires) and are yawed via a turn table mounted in the floor of a tunnel. Multiple studies have been published which illustrate the necessity for rotating the tires in order to achieve improved correlation to real-world results, for examples see.
机译:卡车运输业正在迁至政府对能源独立性的担忧以及提高燃料成本的现实带来的新时代。这对优化8级拖拉机拖车卡车的空气动力学进行了兴趣。然而,许多大量的空气动力学增益已经开发出来,例如拖车裙和船尾,使燃料经济性提高约5%。研究继续更好地了解这些车辆的空气动力学并进一步提高其效率。规模模型滚动道路测试已经存在了几十年。事实上,最早的滚动道路风隧道试验的一级卡车,即作者意识到20世纪80年代后期发生。为了定义重型卡车的性能,已经确定需要使用风平均阻力系数。为了实现风平均阻力系数,有必要使用偏航或滚动道路隧道的偏航模型测量数据。作者以前公布了使用移动接地平面和静态接地平面测试的通用卡车模型的结果。本文建立在采用了更为详细和现代汽车模型的工作。讨论了装配拖车裙部的空气动力学阻力的改进。这些阻力减少转化为燃料效率改善,并与SAEⅡ型测试进行比较。读者能够理解与试图将风洞导致与SAE型结果相关的困难。将探讨与规模模型滚动道路测试相关的一些问题,如雷诺数依赖和在滚动道路上偏航。由于重型卡车的尺寸和性质,必须考虑交叉风。除了跟踪或通道测试外,静态隧道是开发重型卡车的主要实验工具。使用静电地板隧道法,重型卡车型号具有固定(非旋转轮胎),并通过安装在隧道地板中的匝表撕开。已经公布了多项研究,说明了旋转轮胎的必要性,以便实现与实际结果的改善相关性,例如看。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号