首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition Conference >Sequential Failures in Incident Investigation Process Hindering Prevention of Incidents
【24h】

Sequential Failures in Incident Investigation Process Hindering Prevention of Incidents

机译:事件调查过程中的顺序失败阻碍了事故的预防

获取原文

摘要

Over the last 10 years, Oil & Gas operations have come under tremendous pressures due to increasing production demands and economic conditions, demanding higher performance and venturing into technically challenging operating conditions. Operating with aging facilities in harsh environmental conditions and higher crew turnaround, have resulted in higher number of serious incidents. Prevention of incidents remains high on the agenda of oil & gas companies and focus is placed on incident investigations to identify root causes of incidents and development of corrective actions. However, repetition of incidents with similar findings and causes have been observed, raising concerns if right root causes were identified and focused corrective actions were identified and/or implemented. An extended analysis of over one thousand (1000) incidents was conducted to assess degree of repetition of causes and regrouping of causes to assess linkage of human factors with organizational behaviours. It was found that 31% of incidents were triggered by human errors & mistakes whilst 27% were attributed to violations. All violations were deemed as intentional & routine and further investigation was not undertaken. Management Supervion & Employees Leadership was identified a leading root cause category of incidents and this category contributed 20% of incidents followed by Work Planning (18%) and behaviour (12%). 55 % of incidents were caused by human factors and hauman factors were triggered by errors and mistakes rather than violations. Often efforts are exerted to to influence individual's behaviour however human attitude (cognitive, emotional and commitment) is overlooked as linkage between attitude change leading to behavior change, not fully explored. However, linkage from behavior change to attitude change is much stronger. If worker consciously change their behavior, it requires re adjustment of associated attitudes to align with the new behavior. Positive reinforcement is an effective tool to influence individual's behaviour. If discipline and punishment are used to discourage unsafe behavior, the intended results are not achieved (e.g., incident or near miss are not reported for fear of sanctions). Assessment of non-compliant behaviors (Violations, mistakes and errors) & conditions and factors influencing such behaviors are often not evaluated and focused action plans to address abilities and motivations with due consideration to isolated or systemic conditions are instrumental in preventing incicidents.
机译:在过去的10年里,由于增加的生产需求和经济条件,越来越高的性能,在技术上具有挑战性的操作条件下,石油和天然气业务因巨大的压力而受到巨大的压力。在恶劣的环境条件和更高的机组人员转变中经营老化设施,导致了更高数量的严重事件。预防事件仍然高于石油和天然气公司议程的高度仍然很高,重点放在事件调查中,以确定事故的根源和纠正措施的发展。然而,已经观察到具有类似发现和原因的事故的重复,如果确定并识别纠正措施,并达到纠正措施,则提出担忧。延长分析超过一千(1000)个事件,以评估原因和重新组合的重复程度,以评估人为因素与组织行为的联系。有人发现,31%的事件被人类错误和错误引发,而27%归因于违规行为。所有违规行为被认为是故意和常规,并没有进行进一步调查。管理监督和员工领导得到确定事故领导类别,此类贡献了20%的事件,其次是工作规划(18%)和行为(12%)。 55%的事件是由人类因素和哈曼因素引起的,错误和错误而不是违规行为引发。经常努力影响个体的行为,然而,人类态度(认知,情感和承诺)被忽视为态度变化之间的联系导致行为改变,没有完全探索。然而,从行为改变到态度变化的联系更强大。如果工人有意识地改变他们的行为,它需要重新调整相关态度以与新行为保持一致。积极的加强是影响个人行为的有效工具。如果使用纪律和惩罚来劝阻不安全的行为,则不达到预期的结果(例如,未涉及担心制裁,未举报事故或近小姐)。评估不合规行为(违规,错误和错误)和影响这些行为的条件和因素通常不会评估,并重点采取行动计划以应对孤立或全身状况的适当考虑的能力和动机是有助于预防关注的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号