首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Aerodynamics, Ventilation and Fire in Tunnels >On effective close-loop control of longitudinal ventilation in road tunnels in case of fire
【24h】

On effective close-loop control of longitudinal ventilation in road tunnels in case of fire

机译:在火灾中路隧道纵向通风有效闭环控制

获取原文

摘要

The following controller types for effective closed-loop control of longitudinal airflow velocity in road tunnels in case of fire have been investigated and optimised: (1) PI-/PID-controller (proportional-integral-derivative controller) (2) MPC-controller (model predictive controller) In general, for the control of the longitudinal velocity in road tunnels, classic controllers as PI/PID-controllers are used. The control parameters are usually determined by "trial and error". However, if the control parameters are not optimised adequately, there is a risk of slow control and oscillating. Only with optimised control parameters, a fast and robust control can be guaranteed. A modern controller, which is becoming increasingly important in control theory, is the MPC-controller. The two controller types have been optimised and compared according to several criteria.
机译:已经研究了以下控制器的以下控制器类型,用于纵向气流速度的有效闭环控制,在火灾中进行了优化,并优化:(1)PI- / PID控制器(比例积分 - 衍生控制器)(2)MPC-Controller (模型预测控制器)通常,为了控制道路隧道中的纵向速度,使用经典控制器作为PI / PID控制器。控制参数通常由“试验和错误”确定。但是,如果控制参数未充分优化,则存在缓慢控制和振荡的风险。只有通过优化的控制参数,可以保证快速和强大的控制。现代控制器在控制理论中变得越来越重要,是MPC-Controller。两种控制器类型已经过优化,并根据若干标准进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号